Candid Comment - Trapped in Poverty: How ODSP Rules Punish Couples and Those Who Work Creating More Poverty

 

First off, no one in their right mind would suggest that there should be no checks and balances regarding the Ontario Disability Support Program. Taxpayer's money funds the program; therefore, it is incumbent that the program be managed to avoid or mitigate fraud and abuse of the system. This said, the system itself is fundamentally flawed in that it forces those needing it to essentially impoverish themselves to receive funding, this affects all aspects of peoples lives. How does it do that? In this article, I will explore that and also point to some suggestions for fixing this system, which frankly is biased and ultimately is a form of ableism.

Instead of fostering financial stability, the ODSP rules often trap individuals into poverty. These rules force difficult choices, and even incentivize separation for common law and married people and force those who work full-time to reduce hours to avoid breaching the strict rules regarding income. Imagine losing hundreds of dollars of your check due to you or your partner's income. A person on the program or their partner is allowed to work but, the income earned must not exceed $1,000.00. Above this amount, a person on ODSP will face a deduction of 0.75 per dollar on their check. So a person receiving $1,500 in earned income would see their or their partner's check reduced by $375.00. Many people with disabilities live in geared to income housing. Increase income would also mean increasing rent. The result, less money for food and the inability to get much needed medications and other necessities to live.

Consider this hypothetical scenario: Two individuals, each receiving ODSP benefits of around $1,300 per month, decide to marry. Their combined ODSP benefits after marriage could be significantly less than $2,600. The reduction is often justified by the government as a measure to prevent fraud and ensure efficient resource allocation. However, this rationale overlooks the fundamental right of individuals with disabilities to form meaningful relationships without being financially penalized. This is also true if only one person is on ODSP. The person who makes a high wage causes the ODSP recipient to be adversely affected by the person who works income.

 

It's insane to ask people to deliberately impoverish themselves to access ODSP and geared to income housing. Own property that is deemed non-exempt, ODSP will order you to sell it. You are allowed certain assets like an RRSP but, you have to be careful not to sell and draw money from them, or you may become ineligible for support. 

The Ontario Disability Support Program (ODSP) is not a “failed system” in an absolute sense. However, it does face significant and well-documented challenges that have led many to call for substantial reforms.

What ODSP Does Well

1. Basic financial and health support: ODSP provides income support and health benefits to Ontarians with disabilities who qualify.
2. Employment supports: It offers programs to help recipients find and maintain employment.
3. Stability: For many, ODSP is the only stable source of income and medical coverage available.

Major Problems and Criticisms

Inadequate Rates. As of 2025, the maximum income support for a single individual is around $1,308/month, far below the poverty line in most Ontario cities.

 
This makes it nearly impossible to afford rent, food, and other essentials, especially in urban areas. Here are the reasons why:

A slow and complex application process. Long wait times, excessive paperwork, and difficulties in proving disability, especially with “invisible” disabilities (e.g., mental health conditions) create barriers for those seeking to access the program. Other impediments include: 

1. Punitive System Design Earning income can result in benefit clawbacks, discouraging part-time work or entrepreneurship.
2. There are strict assets and income limits, making it hard for recipients to save or plan long-term.
3. Stigma and Bureaucracy.
4. The system often feels adversarial rather than supportive. Recipients may feel surveilled or judged.
5. Reviews and appeals can be traumatic and demoralizing, especially for people with chronic conditions.
6. Lack of Indexing and Inflation Adjustment.
7. ODSP rates have historically not kept up with inflation, eroding their value over time.
8. Recent increases (like the 5% hike in 2022) were considered too little, too late.

Disability advocates, social policy experts, and many ODSP recipients describe the system as:

“Broken”, “dehumanizing”, or “out of touch” with the real cost of living.

Not meeting its mandate to allow people with disabilities to live with dignity and independence.

Dignity, economic security, health, and social inclusion are supposed to be what the program encourages. So what should be done to make that a reality? Here are some ideas:

ODSP is not entirely failing, but it does fail many of the people it’s meant to help, especially when it comes to ensuring that the program meets the mandated goals for which it was created.

Reforming ODSP to be more humane, adequate, and supportive is a frequent recommendation among advocates and policy experts. Across Canada, policy analysts, advocacy organizations, and economists are proposing a range of ODSP reforms to address its shortcomings. The idea is to increase dignity, financial stability, and opportunity for people with disabilities to live and be a part of society.

What Are The Recommendations:

Raise Benefit Rates

What: Immediately raise monthly payments to meet or exceed the Market Basket Measure (poverty line).

Why: Current rates (~$1,308/month) are not enough for rent, food, or basic needs in most Ontario cities.

Examples: Many recommend a base of $2,200/month to reflect actual living expenses.

Index Rates to Inflation

What: Automatically increase ODSP benefits annually based on inflation (CPI).

Why: Prevents purchasing power from eroding over time, as has historically happened.

Improve Earnings Exemptions

What: Raise or eliminate the income clawback thresholds (currently starts after $1,000/month).

Why: Clawbacks penalize those trying to work part-time or freelance. Encouraging employment should not lead to poverty traps.

Model: British Columbia allows up to $15,000/year in earnings without clawbacks.

Streamline and Humanize the Application Process

What: Reduce paperwork, speed up processing, and recognize episodic and invisible disabilities (e.g., mental illness, chronic pain).

Why: Many people are rejected due to narrow definitions or excessive bureaucracy.

End Punitive Surveillance Practices

What: Stop treating recipients like potential fraudsters. Shift to a trust-based model.

Why: The current system often feels intrusive, with fears of benefit loss over minor infractions.

Allow Savings and Asset Building

What: Increase or remove asset limits (currently around $40,000 for singles).

Why: People on ODSP should be able to save for emergencies, housing, or education without losing eligibility.

Integrate Housing and Disability Support

What: Link ODSP with affordable housing programs directly.

Why: Rent is the highest expense, and housing insecurity undermines all other supports.

 Include Lived Experience in Policy Design

What: Involve ODSP recipients and disability advocates in decision-making roles.

Why: Policies typically fail because they are built without input from those affected.

 Who’s Calling for These Changes?

Disability Without Poverty

Income Security Advocacy Centre (ISAC)

Ontario Human Rights Commission

Maytree Foundation

Toronto Foundation

ACORN Canada

Many of these groups stress that incremental changes are not enough, a full transformation is needed to make ODSP a true disability rights program instead of just a survival system.

So, to summarize, ODSP is not entirely failing, but it does fail many of the people it’s meant to help, especially when it comes to ensuring that the program is efficient, effective, transparent, and supportive.

Doug Fords government appears to be more interested in building subways, roads, tunnels, and condos. This while many live in tents in parks under bridges. And while those on ODSP and other supports struggle to survive. In a country that is considered to be among the wealthiest in the world, it's unacceptable to allow this to be the normal for any, let alone the disabled. In an era of tariffs and the need to build our economy, would it not be wiser to create more opportunities for those who can work who are on supports? If Canada and Ontario are going to pivot to a new norm, then a strategy that includes allowing the disabled to integrate into society will help. The future must include the disabled, continuing to ignore the reality that they are in society is not the answer. Creating real solutions and inviting the disabled to help drive the economy is.

Candid Comment - The Focus on The Middle Class and Mega Rich Might Be Misguided a Reality Check

 

For decades, the middle class has been hailed as the backbone of the economy, the engine of growth, and the cornerstone of a stable society. Politicians relentlessly court their votes, economists meticulously track their spending habits, and policymakers strive to protect their interests. But the question is, is this unwavering focus on the middle class truly justified? We as a society also need to question the importance of the mega rich, the 1%

Looking at the reality that is before us, there is a revelation that the economic landscape is far more nuanced. Holding on to the idea that the middle class is the most important group might be hindering our ability to address contemporary challenges effectively. While we will never eradicate poverty and homelessness, we can as a society mitigate it. This means changing the level of importance we place on the middle class as well as the mega rich.

The middle class undoubtedly plays a role in the economy, arguing that they are the most significant piece is an oversimplification. Instead of solely concentrating on this group, a broader perspective that considers the contributions and challenges of both the lower and upper economic strata is crucial. There must be a balance across all economic groups. This is also true when we observe the influence of the mega rich or 1%.

One reason to question the exclusive focus on the middle-class and mega rich is the increasing significance of the upper echelons. In an era of rapid technological innovation and globalization, wealth creation is becoming increasingly concentrated. The wealthy drive investment, innovation, and entrepreneurship. Their capital fuels new industries, creates jobs (albeit often in the lower-paying service sector), and funds philanthropic endeavors. Denying their economic influence is to ignore a powerful engine of growth. We must also consider those who live pay to pay or are poor. 

Denying their existence is folly, and continuing to marginalize them will be the eventual undoing of our society. Poverty can lead to a weakened economy, people who are impoverished typically lack the financial resources to contribute significantly to economic growth. This can result in reduced consumer spending, lower tax revenues, and increased government expenditures on social services. Poverty can perpetuate income inequality, which can further hinder economic development. The other extreme is allowing the rich or so - called 1% hold too much power. 

The widening gap between the rich and the poor can lead to social unrest, reduced economic mobility, and a less cohesive society. Extreme inequality can create a sense of unfairness and resentment, potentially leading to instability. Some economists argue that extreme wealth concentration can lead to financial instability. Excessive savings by the wealthy can lead to decreased demand and slower economic growth. Additionally, the pursuit of risky investments by the wealthy can contribute to market bubbles and crashes.

Furthermore, the struggling lower class requires critical attention. Poverty, inequality, and lack of access to necessities can be detrimental to overall economic health. Investing in education, job training, and social safety nets for the less fortunate not only alleviates suffering but also unlocks untapped potential and expands the consumer base. Raising the bottom lifts the entire economy, boosting productivity and reducing the social costs associated with poverty. The idea is to mitigate poverty because we will never eradicate it.

It's worth noting that the obsession with the middle class comes from a place of good intentions. A thriving middle class is often associated with a more stable and democratic society. They contribute significantly to tax revenue, support local businesses, and participate actively in civic life. A shrinking middle class can lead to social unrest and political polarization. The argument is not that the middle class is unimportant, but rather that their importance should be considered within a broader context. The other question is. What is the impact of the 1%?

The Argument for the 1%: is Innovation, Philanthropy, and Economic Growth. Proponents of a system where significant wealth accumulates at the top argue that the 1% are crucial drivers of economic progress. Their wealth often fuels:

Innovation and Entrepreneurship: High-net-worth individuals are frequently the primary investors in new businesses and groundbreaking technologies. Venture capital, crucial for startups, typically comes from these individuals, funding the next generation of job creation and innovation.

Philanthropy: The 1% are often significant contributors to charitable causes, supporting research, arts, education, and poverty alleviation efforts. Their large donations can have a transformative impact on specific communities and sectors.

Economic Growth: High earners contribute a significant portion of tax revenue, funding public services and infrastructure. Their spending, particularly on luxury goods and services, can stimulate demand and create jobs.

Investment and Job Creation: Their investments in businesses, real estate, and the stock market can lead to job creation and overall economic growth.

From this perspective, the 1% are engines of prosperity, driving innovation and contributing to the overall well-being of society. They are considered risk-takers who deserve the rewards they reap.

But there is a real risk to allowing the 1% to have too much power. The argument against the 1%s power and influence highlights the potential risks associated with extreme wealth accumulation. These risks include:

Exacerbated Inequality: The widening gap between the rich and the poor can lead to social unrest, reduced economic mobility, and a less cohesive society. Extreme inequality can create a sense of unfairness and resentment, potentially leading to instability.

Economic Instability: Some economists argue that extreme wealth concentration can lead to financial instability. Excessive savings by the wealthy can lead to decreased demand and slower economic growth. Additionally, the pursuit of risky investments by the wealthy can contribute to market bubbles and crashes.

Erosion of Democracy: The 1% wield significant political influence through lobbying, campaign contributions, and control over media outlets. This can lead to policies that favor their interests at the expense of the broader population. This can undermine democratic processes and erode trust in government.

Distorted Market Incentives: Wealth concentration can lead to the creation of monopolies and oligopolies, stifling competition and innovation. This can lead to higher prices and lower quality goods and services for consumers.

Moral Hazard: The belief that the wealthy are "too big to fail" can encourage risky behavior, as they expect to be bailed out by the government in times of crisis. This creates a moral hazard that can exacerbate financial instability.

From this perspective, the concentration of wealth in the hands of the 1% poses a significant threat to the economic and social well-being of society. It undermines democracy, exacerbates inequality, and creates the potential for instability.

So what is needed is a new framework for economic analysis that acknowledges the interconnectedness of all economic classes. Instead of focusing solely on the middle class, or the mega rich, we need to consider the entire economic ecosystem. This requires policies that:

Promote equitable growth: Ensure that the benefits of economic growth are shared more broadly across all income levels.

Invest in human capital: Provide access to quality education, job training, and healthcare for all citizens, regardless of their socioeconomic background.

Encourage innovation and entrepreneurship: Foster a climate that supports risk-taking and allows for wealth creation across all sectors of the economy.

Strengthen social safety nets: Provide a safety net for those who are struggling to make ends meet, ensuring that everyone has access to the necessities for basic living.

But, before this can happen, there must be a clear understanding of what needs to be addressed.

Structural factors, such as systemic racism, gender discrimination, and ableism, can limit the opportunities and resources available to certain groups, perpetuating poverty across generations. For example, individuals from racialized communities may face barriers to education, employment, and housing, which can make it difficult for them to escape poverty.

Economic factors, such as stagnant wages, job loss, and underemployment, can contribute to poverty by limiting the earning potential of individuals and families. Additionally, the rising cost of living, particularly in urban areas, can make it increasingly difficult for low-income households to afford necessities such as housing, food, and healthcare.

Social factors, such as inadequate education, social isolation, and lack of access to social support networks, can exacerbate poverty by limiting the ability of individuals to develop the skills and resources needed to escape poverty. Those without access to quality education may struggle to find well-paying jobs, while those without strong social support networks may find it challenging to navigate the complex web of social services available to them.

Eventually, poverty will lead to social unrest, Frustration with the current economic disparity will manifest in various forms, including protests, riots, and even violent crime. Additionally, poverty can contribute to the breakdown of social cohesion, as communities with high poverty rates often experience increased social isolation, mistrust, and discrimination.

If the status quo continues, those in the middle class and below the poverty line will create significant political consequences, as those living in the middle or below the line may feel disenfranchised and disconnected from the political process. This disengagement can lead to lower voter turnout, reduced political participation, and the rise of populist movements that exploit the frustrations of the poor and middle class for political gain. Furthermore, erosion of the middle class and poverty will undermine the legitimacy of democratic institutions, as citizens may lose faith in the ability of their government to address their needs and concerns.

Ultimately, the health and stability of our society depend on ensuring that the benefits of economic growth are shared broadly, and that the risks associated with extreme wealth concentration are effectively mitigated. This requires a thoughtful and proactive approach to policymaking, guided by a commitment to fairness, opportunity, and a vibrant democracy. Only then can we harness the potential contributions of the 1% while safeguarding the well-being of all.

Finding a balance between incentivizing innovation and economic growth, while mitigating the potential risks associated with extreme wealth concentration, is the goal. This requires a multipronged approach, including: 

Progressive Taxation: Implementing a progressive tax system can help redistribute wealth and fund public services.

Strengthening Regulations: Stronger regulations on financial institutions and corporations can prevent risky behavior and protect consumers.

Investing in Education and Opportunity: Investing in education, job training, and social safety nets can create a more level playing field and promote economic mobility.

Campaign Finance Reform: Reforming campaign finance laws can reduce the influence of money in politics and ensure that all voices are heard.

Promoting Competition: Antitrust laws and policies can promote competition and prevent the formation of monopolies and oligopolies.

By shifting our focus from a singular obsession with the middle class and the 1% to a more holistic understanding of the economic landscape, we can create a more equitable, prosperous, and stable society for all. While the middle class and 1% remain important pieces of the economic puzzle, it is time to acknowledge that they are two pieces to a very large economic ecosystem. A more comprehensive approach is required to navigate the complexities of the modern economy. We will never eliminate poverty, but we can eliminate it. We need to protect and grow the middle class, but not obsess over it. Furthermore, we need to check the power of the 1% to ensure that all members of society grow and prosper. It won't be easy, but it can be done.

Candid Comment - Summer Vacation Spots By Province And Territory

 

With the summer approaching, there is no better time than now to look at options for destinations in   Canada. There are plenty of places to explore. We still love our American neighbors but, with the way things are going in the United States, it's better to stay home and support local businesses. Americans are still welcome to visit, please just leave the 51st state crap behind when you come to visit if you are an American. With that, I thought, let's find the number 1 place or thing to do in each of the provinces and territories here in Canada while on vacation.

Prince Edward Island: If you are a fan of Anne of Green Gables, then you're in luck. Green Gables Heritage Place is the most well-known attraction in PEI. Even if you are not a fan of the show, this site is still an interesting place to visit. You can step back in time and see what it would be like to live back in the era that Anne of Green Gables is set, the 1880s. The site is part of Parks Canada. There is plenty to do besides visiting the Green Gables Heritage Place. Take a look at The top 10 attractions on Prince Edward Island at travel.desinationscanada.com

New Brunswick: Another Parks Canada location tops the list of attractions to visit in New Brunswick. Known for being in the area where the highest tides in the world are, this park is a must-see. There is lots to do in the park, so visit their site at Parks Canada to get details on all the activities in the park. Also, take note of the fact that there are other sites to visit in New Brunswick. Travel.destinationscanada.com features a list of the top 10 attractions in New Brunswick.

Nova Scotia: Nova Scotia is a beautiful part of Canada, one of the biggest attractions is Bluenose II https://bluenose.novascotia.ca/. This world-famous schooner is a replica of the original Bluenose, which won many sailing races around the world. Visitors can tour, and even sail on the ship. The top 10 attractions in Nova Scotia according to destinationscanada.com include the Bluenose II.

Newfoundland and Labrador: Signal Hill, the site of the first transatlantic radio transmission is located in Newfoundland and Labrador, note most people just refer to the province as Newfoundland. Also of note is the fact that Newfoundland was actually a country before joining Canada. So Canada has two tombs of the unknown soldier. But, let's get back to Signal Hill. Part of Parks Canada, this site features many things to do, including being able to fire the noon day salute from a gun emplacement there. For me, the cool thing is the ham radio station that goes on the air from time to time. Of course, there are other things you can do while in the province.

Quebec: My home province, I grew up in Montreal and still call myself a Quebecer at heart. I have been to Quebec City and if you are looking to get a feel for European culture, particularly French culture, along with the dining experience, you want to go to Quebec City. Though I have not been to Le Petit Champlain, I do note it is one of the top locations in Quebec City and Quebec itself. Shops and restaurants line the district streets, and you really do get a feel for what it would be like if you were in Europe, specifically France. Travel.destinations.com has a list of 9 other attractions you can visit. Take note, the Ice Hotel is only open in winter. 

Ontario: Besides Quebec, Ontario is my second most lived in place. In fact, I consider myself to be an Ontarian. Though, like I said, I am a transplanted Quebecer. Last year I went to Ottawa for Remembrance day, our national ceremony honoring veterans of the first and second world wars, Korea, and other conflicts our military has been in. As well as peace keeping. This is something every Canadian should do at least once. Ottawa is the capital city of Canada, home of our sovereign parliament where our Prime Minister, not governor, along with our representative of the Crown, Governor General Mary Simons, lives. Toronto is the capital of Ontario. So this makes this province unique, but there is more to Ontario than meets the eye. So take a look at some other spots.    

Manitoba: Fun fact, Winnipeg is not only the home of the Winnipeg Jets, and Blue Bombers, but, is also a city built on a swamp. No kidding, it really is built on a swamp, wrong. But, it does lie in an area with significant wetlands and was historically characterized by marshland and periodic wet meadows. One part of the city you will want to visit is the Exchange District. This part of the city features heritage buildings that contain boutiques, restaurants, and art galleries. Manitoba also has many interesting places you can visit besides Winnipeg. 

Saskatchewan: Home of the RCMP Training Depot and Heritage Centre, Saskatchewan offers unique experiences for tourists locally and internationally. The RCMP has a complicated history, especially with indigenous peoples here in Canada. But, there are other aspects of the police force that are fascinating, so a visit to the Heritage Centre is worth the time. There are other fascinating places you can visit as well while in Saskatchewan.  

Alberta: Home of the Edmonton Oilers, and the Edmonton Elks sports teams. One other unique spot is the West Edmonton Mall. It's HUGE, I have been there a couple of times. The place even has a roller coaster in it. Of course, there is Lake Louise and Banff, another place I have visited, in winter. To say that there is a whole of things to do in Alberta is an understatement. Check out some other places you can visit, click here to go there.

British Columbia: Whistler Blackcomb and other scenic sites can be found throughout BC. This province has some of the most beautiful scenic sites in Canada and each offers up unique experiences for any visitor. Even in Vancouver, you can find interesting places to see, like museums, Stanley Park and the Vancouver Aquarium. See the list of other places by clicking this link.

There are also 3 official territories of Canada. The Yukon, Nunavut, and the Northwest Territories. Each of these regions also has many cool things to do and see, like, the museums, trails and the northern lights and in winter, you can travel around on ice roads. The most interesting thing is that as you go further north, you will notice that there is a distinct difference between day and night. In parts of the north known as the Arctic, 6 months of sunlight vs. 6 months of darkness occurs. Most of the places where tourist attractions are feature either long days in summer or short ones in winter. Plus, you will have to take note that temperatures can be an issue, especially in winter, as many days each of the territories experience temps well below freezing, so prepare before you go. In fact, regardless of where you go, you should be prepared and make sure you have enough money and the proper documents, passports, and visas. Along with appropriate clothing for the time of the year, you are traveling to any part of Canada.

All the lists are from https://travel.destinationcanada.com/en-ca a site with all kinds of information about travel in Canada. I found this site helpful while putting this article together. 

So come to Canada, if you already live here, take a trip to another part of our great not!! 51st state. Our home Canada, true north, strong free and sovereign, has a lot to offer visitors from around the world as well as locally. So visit and enjoy the scene, regardless of where you go in our great country. 

Candid Comment - Let's Talk Sex And Disabled Peeps Dispelling Myths

Ah yes, sex, a subject that for many people is quite taboo, this is even more true when it comes to speaking about people who are disabled. The myth among many is that people with disabilities are not interested in sex at all, Asexual, or are like rabbits, Hyper Sexual. While it is true, some are one or the other, not all disabled people are one or the other. So with that out of the way, here are some other myths that need to be busted. Sorry, the Myth Busters are not joining in this discussion as there are no explosions or other things like that, I just had to throw that in.

For the record, I am a person with a disability, vision loss. I also have some breathing challenges occasionally, and my knees are not as strong as they were when I was younger due to a touch of arthritis. My girlfriend, whom I just started dating, is also a person with disabilities. Muscular Dystrophy being the one that is most prevalent, so you can imagine what it will be like when we decide to have sex, Sorry kids, I am not going to blog about it.

1. People with disabilities can have have sex and they like it! Sex is normal, people with disabilities like to have sex and while it may be challenging for some, it is not impossible. There maybe requirements for support from a third person to facilitate sexual activity, but, it can be done. Furthermore, people with disabilities are intelligent and, despite the myth, are not childlike. Ok, perhaps some are but, most are not. They know what they are doing. Now, of course, the caveat here is that sex should be an activity between adults no matter what. But, you can rest assured, most disabled people do get it, and they know what they are doing when it comes to sex.
2. So in some circumstances you may have to plan the adventure. While it is true that traditional sex is possible for people with disabilities in certain situations, you are going to have to think ahead. We'll take my girlfriend as an example. As noted, she has MD. So I have to think how do I approach her sexually? Starting off slow, being gentle for sure. Other ways to be sexual without going for the big bang are hugging and kissing and gentle touches. Sex is more than the heavy breathing and wham bam thank you ma'am or sir.   
3. You might be surprised to know that there are people out there that are disabled and sexy, I mean real sexy. Sexy is not limited by size or race, and certainly is not by disability. There are many men and women out there who are disabled and very hot. Some are even models and eh hem porn stars! The disabled are no longer closeted in this area. The fact is, there are loud voices advocating for the disabled regarding sex and the definition of sexy and how that should be viewed in society as a whole.
4. 
   People with disabilities date, marry and have sex with people who are not disabled. The pretty lady on the left is my late wife, Darlene. We were married 26 years before her death on Jan 4 2024. For the most part, Dar was not disabled but, eventually, did become diabetic and had autoimmune hepatitis, which can be considered as disabilities. Up into the later years of our lives together, she was not disabled, and we had a good marriage, when she did become disabled, we still had a good marriage. In short, people who are and are not disabled do get together and form relationships, including ones that are sexual in nature. There is no rule that says a person with a disability must marry or have sex with another disabled person.
5. People who have lost feeling in their limbs are still in many circumstances able to achieve sexual stimulation. Whether it is limited or not depends on the disability. How do people who use a wheelchair have sex? The simple answer is, usually in bed! Yes, just like any normal person would. They may also do it on the couch, or even dare I say the kitchen!! You may have to plan a little or, in some cases, a lot, but sex is still possible for people with mobility issues. And we cannot neglect the fact that meds and other factors can cause our sex drive to be affected, but again, with some planning and patience, that can be overcome. However, for some older and really sick people, sex is no longer an option and while that is hard to except for some, it is important to remember that love exceeds sex. And sex is not limited to what is traditional. You can still be sexual without being sexual. Cuddles, hugs, and gentle loving touches and words can be just as sexy as actually having sex.
6. Did you know that people with spinal cord injuries have reported experiencing great pleasure from stimulation in areas like the arms, earlobe, neck, cheek, and nipple. So much so that it can even lead to orgasm! Sex happens in the brain too. There are ways to enhance this, whether it’s through fantasies, relaxation, meditation or breathing techniques. It’s all just a matter of working out personal turn-ons and turn-offs, the best way to do this is with a loving partner you trust! So, in short, what I am saying here is that sex is not just about the genitalia, it's in the mid too.

There are other things to take note of. People with disabilities do identify as LGBTQ2S+. This is the acronym used to represent the diverse community of people who identify as lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, two-spirit, and other sexual and gender identities. The + indicates inclusivity of additional identities. Many disabled people actually connect with sex workers for sex. The reason they do so is because in many instances they tend to be judged by the ability to be sexual. Ableism is a real thing in society and its impacts are felt not only with respect to to employment for the disabled, but in housing, politics and sex. People with disabilities want to be seen as normal people in the community, and they are also wanting to be considered sexy along with employable, housable and able to express opinion on topics including politics. In short, they aim to be a part of the community in every way.

Being a person with a disability myself, I have had to face ableism, mostly related to employment. But, even in terms of sexuality, I have been looked as odd for wanting a relationship, especially since I have a preference towards plus-sized women. People have thought that to be weird and kinky, which frankly it is not. My late wife was a BBW big and curvy, sexy in every way as well as one of the loveliest people I had the privilege of being with. So to close, it's quite normal for everyone, including the disabled, to enjoy a healthy sex life, it's not kinky or weird, believe me.

Below are some resources you can look at that should help you get some insights to understanding what sex and disability are all about.

Kennedy Krieger has an article about intellectual disabilities as it is related to individuals with intellectual disabilities and sex. Sexuality and Adults with Developmental Disabilities is the title.

Ableism 101 is the title of an article / fact sheet about ableism presented by Access Living, an organization that advocates for the disabled in Chicago, IL.

The CBC has some interesting content regarding disability You Can't Ask That is a documentary series exploring various topics re disabilities. Some backgrounder is also on Wikipedia. The CBC has also had radio shows on the topic and even a podcast or two on the subject.

For more resources, head over to Google and search based on disabilities.

Candid Conversations - Canada 51st State - Non-Starter - Here's Why

    

The idea of Canada becoming the 51st state of the United States is a recurring thought. In fact, at one time, a bill was introduced in congress called the Annexation Bill of 1866. Suggested was that the president, at the time Andrew Johnson, be authorized to annex what back then was British North America. The idea, of course, was to come to an agreement with the governments of the British provinces. Then to publish by proclamation that, from the date thereof, the States of Nova Scotia, New Brunswick, Canada East, and Canada West, and the Territories of Selkirk, Saskatchewan, and Columbia would be created.

The Annexation Bill would have created four states and three territories from what is today Canada, additionally, most of the Arctic Archipelago and parts of the Canadian mainland would have become unorganized territory. Below is a list of what this would look like if this were the case today. 

• New Brunswick. Modern-day New Brunswick.
• Nova Scotia. Modern-day Nova Scotia and Prince Edward Island.
• Canada East. Modern-day Quebec, Newfoundland and Labrador, and part of modern-day northern Ontario.
• Canada West. Modern-day southern Ontario, and part of modern-day northern Ontario.
• Selkirk Territory. Modern-day Manitoba, and parts of modern-day northwestern Ontario, Nunavut, Saskatchewan, and the Northwest Territories.
• Saskatchewan Territory. Modern-day Alberta, and parts of modern-day Saskatchewan, British Columbia, the Northwest Territories and Yukon.
• Columbia Territory. The part of modern-day British Columbia and Yukon west of the Rocky Mountains. 

You can read more about this bill on Wikipedia.

    

This cockamamie idea is often raised during times of political upheaval or economic uncertainty in either country. While it is a far-fetched and frankly ridiculous fantasy, it's a proposition that sparks lively debate, prompting consideration of the potential benefits and drawbacks for both nations. An ipsos poll suggests that the idea of becoming a state is of no interest to most Canadians. But, there are some who would say yes to statehood.

According to Ipsos, four in ten (43%) of Canadians age 18-34 would vote to be American if citizenship and conversion of assets to USD is guaranteed.

The supposed "Good" A Unified Vision. Proponents of the 51st state scenario often point to the potential for increased economic prosperity.

It has been suggested that a single North American economy could eliminate trade barriers, streamline regulations, and foster greater investment, potentially creating a powerhouse that could dominate the global market. Imagined is the elimination of border crossing delays for goods and people that would fuel the economy.

A unified military would consolidate resources and potentially enhance national security. This could lead to a more coordinated response to global threats and a more robust defense posture.

Politically speaking, some argue a union would balance out the American political landscape. Canada is considered to be more progressive with respect to social policies, particularly regarding healthcare and gun control. It is felt among advocates of statehood for Canada that there could be potential to moderate the increasingly polarized American political system. Adding millions of voters would significantly alter the electoral map.

The "Bad": Cultural Clash and Loss of Identity. However, there are downsides that are equally compelling. Canada, fiercely proud of its distinct national identity, could see its unique culture swallowed by the much larger and more dominant American culture.

Becoming a 51st state would probably cost the following: Canada losing its sovereignty, its universal healthcare system, its multiculturalism policies, and its parliamentary democracy would be a devastating blow to Canadian identity. For these reasons, most Canadians, and the government of Canada is making it clear, Canada becoming the 51st state is a non-starter.

Economically, while a boosted economy is possible, the reality is that Canadian industries convert to the American style of business they could struggle to compete with their larger American counterparts. That potentially would lead to job losses and economic exploitation. Furthermore, the absorption of Canadian resources, particularly oil and water, could raise concerns about environmental sustainability and long-term resource management. In short, "Drill Baby Drill". Could cost the continent environmentally.

Politically, the integration process would be a monumental undertaking. Reconciling vastly different political systems, legal frameworks, and social values would be a logistical and cultural nightmare. Not to mention decades to implement. Also, indigenous peoples and the francophones of Quebec would not tolerate any attempt to be forcibly assimilated into an Anglo-Saxon culture.

The balance of power in the US Senate and House would be drastically reshaped, leading to significant political potential gridlock. Congress and the Senate would have to be reconfigured to allow for up to 50+ representatives in the house, and 2 senators in the Senate. Which means several states would lose members in the lower house, as the law states that the congress shall not have a seat count exceeding 435.

Canada uses a different approach politically. A constitutional Monarchy means that King Charles is the head of state. The leader of the party who wins an election in Canada is invited by the Governor General, who represents the king, to form a government. And it is the members of the House of Commons with its representatives, using the Westminster system. And there are no term limits like in the US. Oh, and Canada has a Prime Minister, not a Governor. And Canada has provinces, not states, nor are they led by Governors but rather by premiers, who, by the way, are also leaders of parties who are invited to form government after elections by Lieutenant Governor Generals, who also represent the King. And all provinces have legislatures.

Also of note is the idea of the Second Amendment. The right to bear arms.

The US constitutions Second Amendment reads as follows.

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed

Canada has no such provision in its constitution. Canada has strict gun laws. For example, it is illegal to own fully automatic weapons, a taser, and handguns. There are exceptions to these laws. That said, most Canadians would NOT want that to change, especially in Quebec.

Canadian law is unified by the Criminal Code. While in the US, states create their own laws. True, there are provincial laws in Canada and federal laws in the US but, in Canada, the laws provincially and federally are just about the same.

The biggest drawback is in health care and other social programs. In Canada, taxes pay for a universal health care system. Which means that, with a few exceptions, like cosmetic surgery and dental care, Canadians do not pay out of pocket for health care. In general, it is illegal to have a tiered health care system in Canada, though there has been somewhat of a push to allow some privatization. The US has a multi tier system of public and private health care. And while care is easy to get, it's costly and predatory.

It has gotten to the point where recently a CEO of a major health care insurance company in the US was murdered. Luigi Mangione is accused of the crime, killing CEO Brian Thompson, head of United Health. Health care costs in the US can and do bankrupt people, and many of the denials by all health insurance providers have proven fatal for many of their clients. This could happen in Canada but, generally, does not.

Let's get Real, the likelihood of Canada becoming the 51st state is extremely low. It's a nons-tarter period!

Both countries benefit from the current relationship, characterized by strong trade ties and close cultural exchange, without the complexities and sacrifices inherent in a full political union.

However, the debate itself is a valuable exercise. It forces everyone to consider the strengths and weaknesses of the respective nations, to examine values and priorities, and to contemplate the potential consequences of radical political, economic and social change is a good idea from time to time. It sobers the minds of those proposing such a merger and clarifies the fact that, for the most part, making Canada the 51st state is a bad idea. The cost in terms of cultural identity, sovereignty, and logistical challenges makes it a highly unlikely scenario. The current symbiotic relationship between the two nations, characterized by mutual respect and cooperation, appears to be the most beneficial and sustainable path forward for both Canada and the United States. For now, the prospect of a union remains an interesting thought experiment, best left as a conversation starter rather than a concrete political objective.


Resources for this post.

US vs. Canadian Healthcare: What is The Difference? This article outlines the two systems and the differences between them.

Another resource looking at healthcare is the Commonwealth Fund. While Canada is not ranked in the top 3 according to the report, the US fares worse. Ranking last! The report is titled Mirror Mirror 2024.

Worldwide, according to International Citizens Insurance, Canada ranks 4th out of 10 countries worldwide as one of the best countries for healthcare. The US, did not even rank in the top 10.

One of the reasons gun control is fiercely defended in Canada is due to the École Polytechnique massacre. On December 6, 1989, a gunman entered École Polytechnique a school in Montreal, Quebec and killed 15 women and injured 14 others in a terrorist anti-feminist act. This along with other events has been pointed to as the main reason to ban automatic weapons across Canada and, in particular, Quebec.

As for safety and peace, Canada ranks 11th as a safe country, the US 131st! Global Peace Index. Also, in the US, the incarnation rate is high. 1.8 million men and women, and children and teens, are in jail in the US. making it the country with the highest incarnation rate. And, the US does execute juveniles. A teenager aged 14 is the youngest in the US to be put to death.

Thank you for reading this post. You are welcome to comment on this topic. Please note, all comments are reviewed before being posted and any that are deemed inappropriate will not be approved.

Candid Comment - What You Should Never Do On and Off a Train: A Guide to Safety and Etiquette

    

While I was on a train heading to Ottawa last November, I saw a passenger do a stupid thing that nearly got them kicked off the train and arrested. 

This individual decided to board the train heading to Ottawa, that was where they were going. The problem was: He was on the wrong train. The train manager caught this and explained that they would have to reach out to other colleagues and decide next steps. The passenger was a bit miffed at this. Claiming he was not told he was boarding the wrong train as no one checked his ticket. The thing is, when you buy a ticket from Via Rail here in Canada, the train number, car, and seat number are clearly marked on the boarding pass. The person claimed they were a senior, so what. So am I, but I knew what train to board in Toronto and what car and seat I was in. Why, because I read the boarding pass! DUH. Fortunately, for this person, the manger as she put it was going to be a nice lady and move his ticket and seat to her train. Which she did. But, she also noted that the incident would be noted on the traveller's account. Meaning, DO'NT EVER TRY THAT AGAIN!

Train travel comes with responsibilities for you the traveller and the staff on board the train and at the station. Both safety and courtesy play significant roles in ensuring a smooth journey for all passengers. Here’s a guide on what you should never do on and off a train and some of the things that will get you in put in front of the police and ultimately a judge.

Never Neglect Safety

1. Never Ignore Safety Announcements: Safety instructions and announcements are provided for a reason. Never disregard them; they may contain important information about emergency procedures, exits, or changes in schedule.

2. Do not Stand Too Close to the Edge: Whether waiting for your train or exiting, always maintain a safe distance from the platform's edge. Trains can come in unexpectedly fast, and standing too close can be dangerous. I have actually seen teens and some adults make the stupid choice to stick their feet and legs out as a train enters the station. Not only is that going to cause injury to the leg, you may end up under the train DEAD! Never, ever do this. The same applies to sticking your head over the track or in the mouth of a subway tunnel.

3. Do Not Block Emergency Exits: Familiarize yourself with the location of emergency exits and never obstruct them. In the event of an emergency, these exits are crucial for a quick and safe evacuation.

4. Never Cross the Tracks in Unmarked Areas: Trains can travel faster than expected. Always use designated crossing points and never attempt to cross the tracks where it's prohibited. Never try to beat a train at a crossing in a car or on foot. This can lead to serious injury, and often' death.

5. Do not Engage in Horseplay: Playful behavior, such as pushing or shoving, can lead to serious accidents. Always act responsibly in train stations and while on board a train.

Never Disregard Courtesy

1. Do not Use Loud Electronics: Be mindful of your volume. Whether you’re talking on your phone or playing music, keep the volume low to avoid disturbing fellow passengers. Use headphones to keep your audio private.

2. Do not Ignore Reserved Seating: Many trains offer reserved seating. Never occupy seats that are clearly marked for others. Respect the personal space of fellow travelers by adhering to seating guidelines. Remember that your ticket / boarding pass has your assigned seat, sit there and if the car is not full ask the conductor if you may move to another seat. If you are in economy, don't try to crash the business class car and sit there. You paid for economy, you sit in economy.

3. Do not leave a Mess Behind: Clean up after yourself. Leaving trash or food remnants can create an unpleasant environment for others. Use designated bins for waste, and leave your space tidy.

4. Greet and Thank Conductors and Staff: Even though it’s not mandatory, acknowledging the staff with a simple “hello” or “thank you” that can go a long way in fostering a positive travel atmosphere. 

Never Overlook Personal Space

1. Avoid Crowding the Aisles: On busy trains, it can be tempting to push through without regard for personal space. Be polite about navigating aisles, and always allow others to pass if you are blocking their way.

2. Do not Invade Personal Space: Be conscious of the surrounding space. Sitting too close or leaning over someone’s shoulder can create discomfort. Respect the bubble of personal space. In short, don't be creepy.

3. Try No To Travel with Bulky Bags: Keep luggage and bags manageable to avoid taking up too much space. Large items can obstruct pathways and become hazards during an emergency.

Off the Train: Essential Etiquette

1. Do Not Rush Off the Train: When the train stops, resist the urge to leap up and rush out. Be patient. Let others disembark first, especially the elderly, disabled, or those with young children.

2. Do Not Stand in the Middle of the Platform: After exiting, move off to the side of the platform to avoid congesting the area. Allow space for other passengers to disembark safely.

3. Know Where You Are And Where You Are Going: When transferring to another mode of transport, such as a bus or subway, or to another train, keep an eye on the schedule and platforms. Always be aware of your connections to ensure a smooth transition. Know what train or bus, or subway or destination at the end of the trip you are heading to. Never make hasty decisions at the last minute, like running for a train while carrying oversized luggage. This can cause accidents and delays for everyone around you.  So with that said, here are some things that can land you in serous trouble onboard a train or in a station.

1. Disruptive Behavior

One of the most common reasons for passenger arrests on trains is disruptive behavior. This includes yelling, causing a scene, or engaging in hostile interactions with fellow travelers or train staff. Such disruptions can lead to complaints from other passengers and may ultimately require law enforcement intervention to restore order. It’s essential to remember that public transport is a shared space, and everyone deserves a peaceful journey. In short, leave your entitlement behind. 

2. Substance Abuse

Consuming alcohol on trains is permissible in many regions, but excessive drinking can lead to unruly behavior. Being publicly intoxicated, especially if you start bothering other passengers, is a surefire way to attract law enforcement's attention. Additionally, using illegal drugs on a train is strictly prohibited and can lead to immediate arrest. Many transit systems have strict policies regarding drug use, and being caught can result in serious legal consequences. Consuming your booze on trains is a no no, and so is smoking and vaping.

3. Trespassing and Fare Evasion

Failing to have a valid ticket can lead to legal consequences, particularly in systems where fare evasion is treated as a criminal offense. In some areas, you can be cited for trespassing if you attempt to board the wrong train or, a train without a ticket or enter restricted areas, such as maintenance zones or the tracks. Always make sure to follow ticketing regulations to avoid fines or arrest. Yes, a train will stop in the middle of nowhere if you board it and have not paid, and you will be asked to pay or be handed over to the police. And you will be banned from riding trains, possibly for life.

4. Vandalism

Damaging train property, such as seats, windows, or any other part of the train, falls under vandalism laws and can lead to arrest. Many train systems employ surveillance cameras, and perpetrators often find themselves facing hefty fines, community service, or even jail time. It’s crucial to treat public property with respect.

5. Sexual Harassment or Assault

Unfortunately, sexual harassment and assault can occur in any public space, including trains. Making inappropriate remarks, unwanted physical contact, or any form of sexual proposition can lead to criminal charges. Transit authorities take these incidents very seriously, and victims are encouraged to report misconduct. Protecting the safety and dignity of all passengers must be a priority while travelling. Remember this, the staff are not there to make booty calls, and in most cases passengers are not either.

6. Refusing to Follow Instructions from Conductors or Staff

Train conductors and staff have the authority to enforce rules and ensure passenger safety. Ignoring their instructions—whether it’s to exit the train at a specific stop or to comply with safety protocols—can lead to arrest. It’s essential to recognize that these individuals are trained to handle various situations and that following their directions can help ensure a smooth journey.

7. Possession of Prohibited Items

Every train service has its own list of items that are prohibited on board, which in most cases include weapons, explosives, large quantities of alcohol, or hazardous materials. Trying to bring such items onto a train can lead to immediate arrest and charges related to possession of illegal goods. Always check your train service’s policies on prohibited items before travelling.

Conclusion

Travelling by train can be a delightful experience when everyone adheres to safety and etiquette guidelines. From respecting personal space to being aware of your surroundings, small actions can lead to a positive experience for all passengers. Remember, every journey is shared with many others, and practicing
courtesy and responsibility can make a significant difference in enhancing that shared experience. Happy travels!

Candid Comment -Tariffs

  

Tariffs, the word seems to be everywhere these days. But, what exactly is a tariff? How does it work? And why is it not always the best way to go?

Many people think that tariffs are simple, easy to implement, and that they are a great way to get more money into the public purse of a country.  

To understand how tariffs work, we have to know what the point of them is. Tariffs are essentially a tax on imported goods. They work in two ways, the first is an additional cost added to an imported good. Cars are a good example. So a car that is valued at 25,000 might have a tariff added when it is exported to another country, that country pays an additional sum of money, say 1,000. So that car now has 26,000 in cost. You, the consumer, pay that extra 1K for buying that car that was exported to your country because your country levied a 1k tariff on that car that has been imported. A more common approach is to add a percentage to the value. Like 10% on that 25k, which means that same car would have a price tag of 27,500k. 

Many politicians think that tariffs are great ways to get consumers to buy local, protect national security, and get extra money into the economy of their country. Well, yes, they do that, but there are some serious downsides to tariffs. Tariffs are intended to protect domestic industries, encourage local production, or even exert political leverage. However, these seemingly simple taxes can ripple through economies far beyond their intended use. The biggest risk to the economy by imposing a tariff is severe price increases in the economy of the country imposing the levy.  Costs are always going to be passed down to the consumer via the supply chain.  This can hit families particularly hard, especially those on tight budgets, who may find themselves paying more for everyday necessities. Whether it's clothing, electronics, or groceries, tariffs erode purchasing power and can contribute to inflation. High inflation can cause job losses as well. Businesses will always look to maintain the bottom line. Part of that means lowering production of goods and reducing staff. Less product drives up the price of the item being sold in another country, so while a tariff does hurt the exporter, it also impacts the importer.

Trade Wars and Global Instability are another risk. Tariffs by nature are often used in hostile ways against another country. They can cause the attacked nation to escalate, devolving into a tit-for-tat trade war, where countries retaliate with their own tariffs on goods from the original imposing nation. This form of protectionism can disrupt global supply chains, create uncertainty for businesses, and lead to a decline in international cooperation. These trade disputes damage economic relationships and can create political instability in the nation imposing the tariff as well as the target nation, which right now in our world is a risk that no politician should want to take. 

Tariffs are often intended to protect domestic industries, they can ironically have the opposite effect. By making imported components more expensive, tariffs can raise production costs for domestic manufacturers who rely on these goods. This can make their products less competitive both domestically and internationally. Tariffs can shield domestic industries from the competition that drives innovation and efficiency, leading to stagnation and a lack of long-term growth.

Tariffs can also restrict the choices available to consumers. When imports are made more expensive, businesses may choose not to import certain products, limiting consumer access to diverse and potentially innovative goods. By limiting international competition, tariffs can also stifle innovation, as domestic producers face less pressure to improve quality and develop new products.

Tariffs can artificially inflate the price of goods and services in certain industries. This causes a drain on investment. Tariffs also cause resources to be used in a manner that hinders growth in an economy. The misallocation of resources can hinder overall economic growth and reduce long-term prosperity. Resources are diverted from industries that may have stronger growth potential to those being artificially protected, potentially stunting, or radically slowing down innovation and economic advancement.

Tariffs are complex and their Implementation, enforcement, and administration of them is a time-consuming process. It requires dedicated government resources and can lead to bureaucratic inefficiencies. Furthermore, tariffs can be easily circumvented through legal loopholes or illegal smuggling, resulting in further complications and loss of government revenue.

While tariffs may appear to be a quick fix to perceived economic and other political problems, their downsides are often considerable. Increased consumer costs, trade wars, damage to domestic industries, reduced choice, distorted resource allocation, and challenges in implementation all point to the fact that the use of tariffs are not the smartest way to help a country. Instead, policymakers need to consider the broader economic implications and explore more effective approaches that foster fair trade, encourage innovation, and promote long-term sustainable growth. A more considered and comprehensive strategy is crucial to harnessing the benefits of global trade without resorting to the potentially damaging effects of widespread protectionism. Lastly, they should never be used to enforce the will of one nation upon another. Such tactics risk causing the one nation to possibly go to war against another. It's wiser to use diplomatic resources to resolve differences and develop cooperation between nations.

Want to learn more about Tariffs, check these resources out.

EDC, a Canadian website, has an article called Tariffs 101: What are tariffs and how do they impact international trade?

Another source, this one from the US perspective is USC Dornsife, the article Tariffs: What are they, who pays for them and who do they benefit?

And we cannot forget about Wikipedia, yes they have an article about tariffs.

Candid Conversations - 2024 How Did This Blog Do?

 

First, let me take this moment to wish all of you a Merry belated Christmas and a soon-to-be Happy New Year. I hope you have a wonderful time with family over the holidays and in 2025 joy, peace and all that is good will come your way.

2024 has come to its end and this year was a bit of a busy one re the blog, sort of. On average, one article per month was posted. Except for December, so a total of 11 posts were uploaded. The number one post for the year is my commentary on the Governor General's relevance, the article published in November has 737 views, making it the number one post of the 11 posted this year. The lowest in February was a comment on the use of Nitrogen to execute a man in the US. It got 412 views.

A look back shows that the blog did really well, getting 16K in views. The breakdown looks like this.

— Average monthly page views, 1300 views.
— Average Unique visits per month, 1000
— First time visits, 1000 per month
— And about 3 returning visitors per month


September was the best month.

2,503 Page views 1,744 Unique Visits 1,741 First time Visits 3 Returning
Visits to the site broke down as follows:

First Time Visitors    12,350
1-5 Returning Visits        19
6-10 Returning Visits        1
10+ Returning Visits         1

The time spent on the blog is very critical, and I am happy, to see such good results.

Hits      Session Length

9313     Less than 5 secs

1163     From 5 secs to 30 secs

2013     From 30 secs to 5 mins

5           From 5 mins to 20 mins

1           From 20 mins to an hour

1           Longer than an hour

2013 From 30 secs to 5 minutes is right in the middle. The so-called sweet spot. This metric points to the fact that people are actually reading posts. Looking at the 20 minutes as well as the longer than an hour stat could mean many things, like people parking and leaving the site up, or possibly, someone scraping the site.

Most of the visits were from the US. In fact, the bulk of them were.

90% of the 16k views were from the US.
Canada, a mere 36 views accounting for less than 1%
Here is the kicker, the next largest view ratio 3% is from the Russian Federation with 488 views total.

So, to say the least, the blog has done very well. And I am pleased to say that the growth continues. 16,000 is the largest so far since launch in 2009. To date, the blog has over 51,000 views. I can thank everyone enough for making Candid Conversations a success.

So what is next? The blog format has changed. As you can see, it's now more comments oriented, and that will be the direction going forward. The interviews are now done on Candid Conversations Zoomed In and Video Comments. The comments will be more or less changed to focus on interesting facts and will even be re-titled. More on that when I do my next post on the site. You can visit the channel via this link.

Thanks again for being a part of Candid Conversations, I hope you will come back soon, and I wish all of your happiness in 2025.