Tales From The Cube

Friday, November 25, 2022

Candid Comment - Video Edition - FIFA World Cup - GO CANADA

Canada qualified and is in the World Cup in Qatar.  They have played against Belgium and lost 1 nil.  But that should not be considered a failure.  In fact the idea of Canada actually being in the World Cup is an amazing feat and one that all of Canada should be proud of.  In this short commentary I dive into why I think it is a win for Canada despite the loss against Belgium.

One thing of note is that Qatar has not had an easy go of it.  The nation has faced stiff criticism re it's morality laws, and it's labor record and of course what is going on in Iran.  While it is important to address the concerns it's also important that the players focus on the play not the politics.  With that out of the way here are a few links and the connection to the video on YouTube.

All except one link are Wikipedia pages.

FIFA, Canada men's national soccer team, and World Cup 2026.

The Sporting News article on who has won most World Cups



 

Thanks for stopping by. Please come back for more content.  Also if you want to do a Candid Conversations via email or Zoom please reach out to me at candidconversations@hotmail.com.  

Cliff T.

Thursday, November 24, 2022

Candid Conversations - Dr. Gareth Carrol Psycholinguist / Author of Jumping Sharks ad Dropping Mics Drops Some Knowledge About Idioms

I bet you can’t go a day without using an idiom. What? An idiom, what the heck is that? Well here is an example of one to explain it. Going forward, which means from now on do this or that thing. So it would be used like this. Going forward, lunch will be from 1 to 2 for all staff. In his book Jumping Sharks and Dropping Mics: Modern idioms and where they come from, Dr. Gareth Carrol a Senior Lecturer in Psycholinguistics at the University of Birmingham in the UK dives into the world of idioms and explains them and their origins. Dr. Carrol welcome and thanks for doing a Candid Conversation.

Dr. Carrol.: Thanks for having me! I always enjoy talking about idioms and, as you say, we all use them all the time, so it’s a fun topic to investigate.

Cliff T.: I heard speaking about idioms on a podcast recently and I thought that is interesting. The idea that we use idioms pretty much on a daily basis was a surprise to me and I must admit I never really thought about them until now. One that drives me nuts to this day is going forward. I had a boss who was famous for using that idiom almost daily. I bet being a person who looks at these things really causes you to notice idioms more than most people.

Dr. Carrol.: Yes, absolutely. I’ve been studying idioms as a part of a wider set of what linguists call “formulaic phrases” for about 10 years now, so I’m pretty well-attuned to them. I’m not sure I personally would call “going forward” an idiom, but it’s definitely a formulaic phrase that people say (and most people understand) but that can seem quite cliched and over-used.

Cliff T.: Why idioms what got you interested in doing a book about them?

Dr. Carrol.: It was a bit of an accident really. I did my Masters degree in Nottingham, UK about 10 years ago and one of the classes I took included some material on formulaic phrases and idioms, and how we make sense of them from a psycholinguistic point of view. I found it really interesting and when it came time to do a PhD, started thinking about ways to investigate this. Once I then started teaching I taught a class where I asked students to think about idioms that they used in their daily life, and it occurred to me that there are plenty of “modern” idioms that have entered the language in the recent past that we might want to pay attention to. The book came from there really.

Cliff T.: Has writing the book caused you to notice idioms more often?

Dr. Carrol.: Oh definitely. It’s always nice when I hear one of the idioms from the book being used “in the wild”, as it proves that they actually are idioms that are in common use! It’s a funny mix though. As you said at the start, we all use idioms on a regular basis, so we speak idiomatically a lot, but individual idioms might be quite rare. Think of a phrase like “raining cats and dogs”. Everyone knows what means (at least in the UK they would), but I can’t think of the last time I actually heard anyone use it (I’m not sure I ever have!)

Cliff T.: Jumping Sharks and Dropping Mics these two are very famous idioms, I have used them myself. Another that also is a favorite of mine is knowing is half the battle. Which of course means knowing what’s going on is half the challenge. That brings me to my next question what are idioms meant to do, why do we use them?

Dr. Carrol.: So this raises two really interesting questions about how we use language. First, why do we use “non-literal” language at all, like idioms, metaphors, and other figures of speech? Idioms like “kick the bucket” or “jump the shark” are obviously figurative, in the sense that they aren’t supposed to be interpreted literally. It turns out that metaphor is a really pervasive part of how we think and therefore how we structure our language. Even your example from before – going forward – would be an example of a metaphor, as it thinks about time passing as if it is movement through physical space. So speaking “non-literally” and drawing comparisons between things is a key part of how we communicate. The second question is, why do we speak in such a formulaic way? We could be infinitely creative and come up with colorful new metaphors each time we wanted to speak, but that would be exhausting! So using well-established phrases makes communication easier and more efficient, and also helps to establish a sense of group solidarity: if we all use the same phrases, we clearly all belong to the same “team”.

Cliff T.: Dr. Carrol this book sounds like it was quite the challenge considering the vast number of idioms out there. How did you go about selecting the idioms you wanted to use for Jumping Sharks?

Dr Carrol: There are already lots of good books and websites out there that give lists of idioms. Generally, these are phrases that have been in the language for a long time (phrases like “kick the bucket” go back hundreds of years). I wanted my focus to be modern idioms, so I focused on phrases that have come into English in perhaps the last 50 years or so, and specifically from sources like TV, movies, internet, etc. One big advantage here is that we can track these much more accurately, from first printed usage, to how they have come to be used in print and online. For example, we know that “jump the shark” relates back to an episode of Happy Days (where one of the main characters, Fonzie, jumped over a shark on a pair of water skis), and we know the first time this phrase was used, in the 1980s. Other phrases we can trace back to specific movies, such as “Groundhog Day”, so we have a really clear idea of when they first emerged and how they have developed since.

Cliff T.: Is there a proper way or time to use an idiom?

Dr. Carrol.: I think all idioms are to a degree context-specific. So the example I keep using – “kick the bucket” – is quite a tongue-in-cheek way of saying “die”. Obviously you wouldn’t expect a doctor to come out and break bad news to someone by telling them that their loved one had “kicked the bucket”. So there are certainly what we would call “pragmatic” rules that tell us when it might be appropriate to use different idioms. We tend to have lots of idioms for death and sex, for instance, that vary in terms of their formality, what kind of company you might use them in, etc.

Cliff T.: I have to ask what do you do as a Pyscholinguist?

Dr. Carrol.: I have one foot in linguistics and one foot in psychology, so a good way to think about it is that I was originally a linguist, interested in studying language and how it works, and became interested in the tools that people use in psychology research to understand how we process language, i.e. how our brains make sense of language in real time. I do a lot of experimental work where I set up studies and record how people read a piece of text (usually containing idioms!) to see what factors make this easier or harder, then use this to work out what must be happening in the brain for them to make sense of what they’ve read. It’s a lot of fun!

Cliff T.: What got you interested in linguistics?

Dr. Carrol.: I originally went to university to study French and had to take linguistics at the same time, but quickly became much more interested in that side of things. So it was not entirely planned, but I always loved studying English language at school and it came very naturally to me. My mother was an English teacher too, which probably helped.

Cliff T.: Will there be a sequel to the book?

Dr. Carrol.: I hope so. I’ve already started gathering a new list of idioms so I’ll need to wait until I have enough to make it worth writing. Since there are new phrases emerging all the time, hopefully it’s an ongoing project!

Cliff T.: Where can people find Jumping Sharks and Dropping Mics?

Dr. Carrol.: You can find out more about the book on my website(www.modern-idioms.com/books) or Twitter (@Modern_Idioms), and there are links on there to various places you can buy it. You should hopefully also be able to order it through your local bookshop, or via the usual online retailers.

Cliff T.: Dr. Carrol it’s been interesting and fun to speak with you about this interesting form of language today, thanks for taking the time to do a Candid Conversations interview.

Dr. Carrol.: Thanks a lot!

Dr. Gareth Carol is a Psycholinguist and Senior Lecturer Department of English Language and Linguistics Birmingham University in Birmingham England.

His book Jumping Sharks and Dropping Mics can be found on most books selling sites like Amazon in fact here is the link to it.  No need to tell you where he wrote us from, that is pretty self evident. By the way you can do a Candid Conversations interview, all it takes is an email to candidconversations@hotmail.com and don’t forget there is a YouTube channel as well. Zoomed in video interviews and other content is available for viewing. Click over and take a look. See you soon and thanks for coming by.

Cliff T

Sunday, November 20, 2022

Candid Comment - Video Edition - Happy Days

For 11 years Happy Days aired on ABC and was a cult favorite. It features the Cunningham Family Richie, Joanie Marion and Howard and of course the Fonz. The show was pretty clean cut for the most part but, as the time passed the antics got sillier and the show deviated from the story of your Richard Cunningham to the Fonz and his role as hero. While the show was a fan favorite it eventually did lose credibility to a degree after the episode featuring the Fonz jumping the shark. Another notable thing about this show was the implied sexual tone, though never really explicit it was pretty clear that sexual activity was pretty hot and heavy. That said no real sex scenes appeared on the show, just a lot of so called making out. What really ended it thought, in my opinion, was the fact that Fonz could do no wrong always got the girl and could do things that really were just impossible. Overall this show was positive and fun, but it just got to silly to really be credible any longer and in the end finally came to an end with Joanie and Chachi get married. A great show that just got way to silly and unrealistic but, even today is still loved and watched in syndication.



Tuesday, November 8, 2022

Candid Conversations Pick - My Movmember Page

Movember is upon us.  The annual event to support Men's health and cancer prevention specifically prostate cancer is off and running.  Besides the physical there is the mental health aspect as well. The prevention of suicide amongst men is important.

I was asked to jump into the Movember band wagon by a colleague at work who has been touched by cancer, he has been cancer free for 10 years.  I also have a brother in law who has been touched by cancer as well.  In fact a number of my family have been.  My grandmother namely, was felled by cancer in the 80s.  What got me into this though was the mental health aspect.  Men generally like to think they are tough and can handle things on their own.  Which can lead to some bad outcomes re mental health.  

Back in the 90s I was foolish got involved with a lady I should never have gone near and it took me a long time to get mentally well again.  About 2 to 5 years.  This included engaging with a mental health professional to get sorted out.  That was after nearly jumping in front of  a train.  So yes it's important to support causes like Movember.  This year I joined and am for Movember I am setting a goal of 200 dollars.  I would love it if readers would drop into the site and drop some coin into the donation box so to speak.  

So with that click over to my Movember Page and thanks in advance for the support.

Tuesday, November 1, 2022

Candid Comment - Traveling While Disabled - It's Up To You To Plan!!

Recently Air Canada had to admit that they goofed when it came to dealing with a passenger who is blind.  Dana Wainwright, a Canadian who lives in the U.S. was not allowed to bring her service dog on to the flight home from Toronto to Minnesota.  Her return home was altered, she had to take a train car and then plane home, cost 2000 dollars and a whole lot of ooooo I am not happy with Air Canada.

To be fair the airline does make it clear that persons with service animals must register before the flight. That is on Ms. Wainwright, she should have known that as it was pointed out to her on the inbound leg of her journey into Toronto on AIR CANADA.  Being good sports they allowed the dog to board with her.  That said on the trip home that did not happen.  So where is the fault for Air Canada.  The way they handled it.  The biggest being not wanting to speak with Ms. Wainwright, but with her daughter.  Woah, not cool not cool at all.  They could have also made a second exception to allow the dog on and provided polite but, firm clear instructions, that in future the dog must be registered.  So in reality here both are at fault.  Ms. Wainwright should  have called to check before the flights to ensure the dog would be allowed on board and Air Canada staff should have been more respectful.

I have travelled on planes trains and buses myself.  Locally I am on a bus everyday.  I am aware of the rules for the system I am on, and or I try to be aware of them.

For example:

HSR the local bus company here in Hamilton allows me to ride fare free.  BUT, I have to show proof that I am allowed to do so and that means showing my CNIB card.

GO Transit allows me to ride on on one fare and have a person as guide. If I choose not to have a guide guess what, I pay for the ride.

Toronto TTC allows free travel, but you need two cards, one is the CNIB and the other a special pass that is issued by TTC.  Now a lot of times the staff will allow for a person to go through, like me without the pass from TTC, they know a tourist may come through, or a patron is from another city.  OK but, I have been stopped and yes told I have to pay, and so I did.

In Quebec the CNIB card is NOT recognized so I have to pay for the trips.

On VIA I pay one fare for 2 people.

You see the trend right.  Now to be fair here Ms. Wainwright is not registered with CNIB and that makes things tougher for her in  Canada as a whole. That is where the gap lies.  For now it would probably be wise for her to call ahead and check before traveling.

As for the agencies.  Sure some disabled people are grumpy and not so nice.  Ugh I am so sad to know that this is a thing.  As I work in the service industry and deal with rudeness each day.  But, the job still requires tact and respect as well as integrity and being aware that the situation may require a bit of thinking outside of the box.  I applaud Air Canada for apologizing, that shows that they are listening and want to do better.  

An informed person is going to make better decisions about anything including travel.  Air Canada has staff who can help people with disabilities travel.  It's the Medical Desk team that provides info on hat to expect and what is and is not allowed on a flight.  Westjet and other carriers like them and Air Canada have specific guidelines and it's up to you not them to plan for the trip, whether you are disabled or not.