Weirdness in Politics - Quirky Characters And Their Antics Impact - This Edition of Candid Comments

 

Politics has always been a stage where in certain circumstances dramatic personalities and eccentric behaviors are seen. Across the ages, various individuals emerge, each bringing us their unique flavor to the political landscape. While many politicians strive for professionalism, there is a substantial number of so-called “weirdos” who’ve made a mark, shaking up the norms, bending rules, and occasionally sending observers into fits of laughter (or bewilderment). These characters prove that politics can be as unpredictable and colorful.

The Eccentric Politician Archetype

Historically, the world of politics has been filled with figures who defy convention. From Henry VIII’s notorious excesses to the flamboyant oratory of Winston Churchill, the quirky nuances of these leaders often become a part of their legacy. But what constitutes “weirdness” in politics? Typically, it is defined by the actions and words of politicians who operate outside the typical boundaries of political discourse or engage in unusual behavior that captivates public attention in humorous and horrific ways.

Take, for example, the case of the late Italian Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi, who was as well-known for his controversial reality TV shows as he was for his political manoeuvres. His brash comments, penchant for drama, and larger-than-life personality exemplify how a so-called “weirdo” can dominate headlines, for better or worse.

The Rise of Outsider Candidates

Lately, the rise of outsider candidates has redefined our perception of political oddities. Figures like Donald Trump in the U.S. and Boris Johnson in the U.K. have thrust themselves into the political limelight, not for their adherence to traditional political norms, but for their outlandish styles and often inflammatory statements. Their unpredictable behavior and unconventional approaches have appealed to disenchanted voters seeking change, illustrating how “weirdness” can garner significant support by bucking tradition.

Social media has only amplified this trend. Platforms like Twitter and TikTok have become the breeding ground for political antics, making it easier than ever for politicians to share their offbeat thoughts, whether they’re making bizarre memes or engaging in improbable debates. This new political landscape blurs the lines between celebrity culture and serious governance, inviting a wider array of personalities into the ring.

The Comedic Touch

Sometimes, weirdness in politics takes a comedic turn. Many political figures employ humor—not always successfully—to connect with their constituents. Take former U.S. Senator Al Franken, who famously transitioned from a successful comedy career on “Saturday Night Live” to politics. His humor initially gave him a unique platform but also contributed to his swift fall from grace amidst allegations of misconduct.

Then there are politicians like Kenneth “Ken” Livingstone in the U.K., known for his peculiar yet amusing quotes, which have led to both laughter and outrage. His unconventional approaches and unapologetic honesty transformed the perception of what an elected official could be, highlighting the balance between serious governance and an engaging public persona.

The Consequences of Weirdness

However, it’s not all fun and games. The rise of eccentric characters in politics can have significant consequences. Sometimes, the tweet that goes viral leads to personifying serious issues in ways that undermine meaningful discourse. Politicians risk trivializing critical subjects through humor or oddity, diverting attention from actual policy discussions. Additionally, the normalization of bizarre behavior may lower the standards for political decorum.

Moreover, the phenomenon of so-called “weirdos” can lead to polarization. Politicians who thrive on shock value may further entrench divisions within societies, appealing to the “us vs. them” mindset. This tactic risks abandoning pragmatic solutions and fostering animosity, which ultimately can destabilize governance.

Conclusion

“weirdness” in politics represents a fascinating mix of innovation and unpredictability. Whether those who are offbeat are shaking up norms, offering comic relief, or creating controversy, these figures play a crucial role in shaping the political landscape. Their impact can ultimately drive voter engagement, inspire change, and challenge conventional wisdom. Yet, as society embraces the quirks and oddities of political personalities, it’s essential to remember the importance of accountability, integrity, and substance in governance. As we navigate through the peculiar politics of our time, it’s vital to discern the line where eccentricity enriches discourse versus where it detracts from the serious challenges that face our global society.

Candid Comment: The True Cost of Experiencing Live Sports: A Winnipeg Jets vs. Toronto Maple Leafs Dilemma

As a die-hard fan of the Winnipeg Jets, the thrill of attending a live game has always been a dream. The electrifying atmosphere, the roar of the crowd, and the excitement of seeing the team battle it out on the ice create memories that last a lifetime. And when it comes to a matchup between the Winnipeg Jets and the Toronto Maple Leafs, the coolness factor to seeing them play live kicks in. However, recently, my enthusiasm was quickly dampened by a harsh reality: the soaring cost of tickets. The allure of the Jets vs. Maple Leafs Showdown seems just too expensive to consider, no matter how much I want to jump in and go to the game in Toronto when the Jets are in town.

The Winnipeg Jets have built a passionate fan base since their return to the NHL in 2011. The team’s recent successes, paired with their competitive spirit, has ignited the interest of many local national, and even some international fans, myself included. When the schedule was released, and I noticed the Jets were set to play the Toronto Maple Leafs just before Christmas this year — one of the most storied franchises in hockey history — I was ecstatic. It was a chance to witness a game between two excellent teams. However, my excitement took a nosedive when I looked into purchasing tickets. The Sticker Shock was a hard hitter. For the cheapest seats, ones where you need binoculars to see what is going on during the game, 179 was the asking price. Want to be near the glass 1,000 dollars, that is nuts! The prices are staggering. Even the upper-tier seats are overpriced to the point that it is hard to digest. Yet people actually pay these ridiculous amounts to see a game. I pity the dad who brings his family to watch a game. By the end of the night, the spend on tickets, food, transport to and from the game will be at least 700 or 800 dollars. That is for just one child and another adult! Imagine what the cost would be for a set of seats near the glass, and like I said, people pay these prices.

A range between $100 and $1000—or more—per ticket. For many fans, especially those of us on a budget, this amount is simply untenable. The disconnect between fans and live sports is definitely a reality. This dilemma is not unique to me, nor is it confined to the Winnipeg Jets or the Toronto Maple Leafs. Across the NHL and even other professional sports leagues, the skyrocketing costs of attending games have raised concerns about accessibility. An evening out to watch a game, which once felt like an affordable luxury, has morphed into a financial burden for many fans. 

While teams need to generate revenue and cover operational expenses, it appears that a balance has been lost. When ticket prices soar, the very essence of what makes attending live sports special—the community spirit and shared experiences—dwindles. For many families and individuals, the option of cheering from the couch with friends and snacks has become more appealing than battling the financial strain of live attendance. In short, it appears that sport, including hockey, has become a playground for the rich. You have to have a large sum of cash to even think about going to a game.

Finding Value in Sports, how can that be done? As I contemplated my experience with shopping for a ticket, I realized that sports fandom is about more than just attending games. It’s about community, loyalty, and passion for the game. While the dream of watching the Jets take on the Maple Leafs live in Toronto may have slipped away due to financial constraints, my love for hockey and support for the Jets remains steadfast. Perhaps I’ll join other fans in watching the game from a local pub or gather with friends for a viewing party at home, where the drinks and snacks won’t break the bank. Quantity and quality of experience often trump the mere act of being physically present at the game.

And if I had the opportunity to sit with the league's honchos and team owners, I probably would suggest a redo on how to encourage the so-called blue color fans to come back to see games live. But, alas, I don't really think they are interested in hearing from such fans, at least that is my impression.

As the Jets embark on another season, the fervor, and excitement will undoubtedly continue to thrive. Even if I can’t watch them live at the Scotia Bank Arena, I’ll still be celebrating each goal, each hit, and each victory from wherever I find myself. After all, real sports fans know that it’s the love of the game and our connection to our teams that ultimately prove invaluable—ticket prices notwithstanding.

Candid Comment - Rents Are Ridiculous!

Renting in Canada has become ridiculous. Most of Canada's cities have seen rents increase to ridiculous amounts for spaces that in some cases are so small a person can barely move around in them. It has gotten to the point now where many people are either moving in with family or are having to consider a roommate. Just getting a place is absurd, in every province, except Quebec, renters are required to give the landlord 2 months rent up front and in some provinces, like Alberta, other deposits are required. 

In general, you are not going to find a place for less than 1000. In fact, anything under this is usually what a person is charging for a room. Room rentals have also become a thing. Many people are doing this and, here is the kicker, at least in Ontario. Those renting out rooms ALSO want first and last month's rent and also run credit checks! Imagine that, to rent a ROOM! How did we get here?

The first place to look at is regulation, or the lack of it, and the desire to do nothing about it. Ontario, where I live, has almost become a free for all zone for landlords. No rental controls for buildings built after 2018, the idea that you can force people to submit to a credit check for every rental application. The ridiculous request for the first and last month of rent and in some cases a deposit are what incentivizes people to get into the business of renting. Another way that rents have gone through the roof, pardon the pun, is the use of renovations to evict a tenant. The idea is this, inform the tenant they have to leave for a renovation to take place, then when the tenant is gone. Poof, never mind the reno is not needed, up goes the rent and the tenant who left is out of a home. Another way landlords are using the law to get tenants out and increase rent is to ask for the unit to be vacated for a family member, well, well, well. So uncle Joe is going to move in, or is he? In most cases, he is not, again up goes the rent happy landlord, unhoused person. Is it any wonder why we have tent cities across Canada? Then there is the short-term rental issue.

Ah yes, short-term rentals. I have to admit, I like them. And I have no problem with the concept. They provide a great way for someone to make some money to pay for rent or the mortgage. The concern is when people by a home for that sole purpose. Or build a home for the sole purpose of making money as a short-term renter. It gets even more messy when an owner of a low rise decides to rent out apartments as short-term rental units. 

So what can we do to fix this? Certainly tent cities are not the answer, and yet it appears that governments are more or less shrugging their shoulders and saying, let the police handle them by essentially doing little to nothing to fix it. You see, the poor and disabled are not interesting enough to politicians. They do not vote and, for the most part, do not pay any kind of tax. Letting the police handle them is just as dumb as doing nothing. Police do not have the time or proper resources to go chasing after the homless all the time. Frankly, it is not what taxpayers pay them to do. So the answer has to come in the form of action that makes sense. 

Here are some ideas that might help in dealing with this issue. 

1. Those renovations, prove that it is needed. Some cities like Hamilton, Ontario are putting bylaws that now require that. Toronto, one of Canada's largest cities, is also looking at a bylaw.

2. Again, looking at Hamilton, the city has taken the approach that regulation is key to managing housing. Tackling Short-Term Rentals by creating a bylaw that requires a license to operate and only allows a guest to stay up to 28 days. This means those who use sites to list their second home on short term rental sites have to have a license, and this also applies to a person who rents out a room on the site. Toronto also has such a bylaw, and it is being beefed up.

3. Another thing that needs to go is the notion of paying last month's rent. Across Canada, except in Quebec, renters are required to fork out the first and last month's rent. In an era of high rents, the idea of asking people to put out 2 months of rent is offensive. It's bad enough that in each attempt to rent, a person has to provide credit checks for each application. Which by the way can wreck credit scores. So axing the deposit, which is what the last month's rent is, should be a no-brainer but, again, the government just shrugs its shoulders and says meh. But, meh won't work anymore, and axing the deposit is the best way to give more breathing space to people who are looking for an apartment or home to rent.

4. Ah, and what about our fictional uncle Joe, who the landlord says he needs your unit for? That may be a real thing but, in most case's uncle Joe is never going to take possession. Really, would you charge your family member 2k a month to rent your basement or one of your apartments? So creating a rule or set of them might be in order. That prevents people from using the family member needs to have a home loophole to rent the unit at a higher rate to a new person. It's not unfair to ask for proof that the person who is a family member is going to live in the unit. Some affidavit or other proof, this is a reasonable ask. Even the possibility of banning renting to a family for certain types of rental units, like those in a high rise, are options that should be explored. Maybe it may be a good idea to show that indeed uncle Joe is paying full rent, yep the whole 2k for up to a year. With the requirement that the landlord aka the niece or nephew of uncle Joe has to show statements that they are indeed paying rent to live in the unit just like any other renter. After a year, good ole uncle Joe can then pay a smaller amount or 0. The point is to close the loophole and ensure that there is a real relative living there, not a new tenant paying 3 or 4k for the unit.

5. Reforming landlord tenant boards. In particular, the one in Ontario is a critical, just about every filing requires an intervention by the board via a hearing. There are cases that come before the board that should never have made it to a hearing stage. It might be a good idea to look at what the board does and consider the various orders it receives filings for and how they are managed. But, again, the government does not want or care to do it. That has lead to a massive increase in the backlog of cases and is costing everyone involved in the process. The solution may require new hires and less political appointments for buddies and supporters of the premier, a look at what is a serious vs. a not so serious case and throwing out some cases altogether may be the answer. To be fair, not all landlords are crooked, money grubbing people. They are also stuck in a bad situation with having to deal with tenants who do not pay the rent, refuse to leave, and damage property. But, the majority want to hang on and stay where they are because there is simply no place apart from the park, parking lots, shelters, and under bridges in a tent. Is that really acceptable? No. 

It is time to embrace innovative approaches, add regulation and get the politics and business mentality adjusted so that the issue of housing can be addressed. Simply put, this can no longer continue to be the norm and the divisive nature of housing is only leading to the risk of more and more clashes between tenants and landlords along with the unhoused. It just takes one spark to start a fire and the whole thing blows up, which technically is what has happened here.

The answer ls not just more housing but, better management of the rules surrounding tenancy and the implementation of rules and regulations to underpin the value of each person's right to a home. It's time to recognize the unhoused and the tenants as stakeholders and to invite them into the process to make the changes needed. And it is time for governments to stop playing politics and start doing it's part to resolve the issue.

Below are some additional resources you can review that relate to this topic.

The Monitor has an excellent article that addresses Ontario Rent Control.

Want to learn more about rent control policy in Canada. Visit the Canadian Centre for Housing Rights site. They have an article about rent control across Canada.

Candid Comment - Time To Go Joe - Bye Bye Trudeau

In North America, there are two leaders facing some serious pushback from their citizens as well as within their respective parties. They are, of course, Justin Trudeau of Canada and Joe Biden of the U.S.  These two leaders are desperately trying to hold on to power for different reasons. But, the bottom line is their respective sands of time are fast running out. The clock on their time in the office they hold is about to chime midnight, and the exit stage looms large. Both still want to continue in their roles. 

While it is noble to want to continue to serve, it's just as noble to know when your service is done. Understanding that there is a time to say I am done, the work is finished, is just as important as continuing on in a role. The problem is that these two gentlemen do not realize, or maybe they do not want to realize, that the best before date has long since been passed on their time in office. Now it is time to hang it up and ride off into the sunset or to the next thing. Each has done well in office, Mr. Trudeau helped Canada through the pandemic, and Joe Biden restored stability in America after the years of the three - ring circus that was the Trump presidency.

It is understandable that Joe Biden wants to ensure another Trump defeat, after all, the U.S. did not look so good during the years that the Donald was in office. And for Mr. Trudeau, the idea of setting a record and winning another election is not wrong, we all have goals and want to see if we can achieve them, and Trudeau is no different. But, knowing when to end it is just as important as knowing when to continue. 

For Joe Biden, it is the age factor and that horrible debate he had. It was crystal clear that he just does not have the mental capacity to lead the United States. Simply put, Mr. Biden is not fit for the role. There is no reason to dive deeper into why this is, it's clear his mental capabilities are diminished, and he cannot function at the level needed to do the job. Being old is not a crime, nor is it a bad thing. But, one needs to come to terms with the reality that they can no longer cut it in certain aspects of life due to age and health constraints. Being brave enough to admit that and let others help you or knowing it is time to leave your role and move on to the next thing or just ride off into the sunset and enjoy retirement. These are signs that you are mature enough to know when to go on and when to stop and pivot away to the next thing. This is what Joe Biden has to take to heart and understand. It's time to go, Joe, it's time to go.

As for Mr. Trudeau, politics can be rough and there are times when sticking it out is very much the thing to do. This is not one of them. The polls widely suggest a change is in order, and pride needs to be set aside, sure it would be cool to win another election, to extend the Trudeau legacy. Buddy, this isn't it. Time is up, and the electorate have made it obvious that the Liberal reign is coming to an end if you stay on. The only true way to see your party continue in power, possibly, is to remove yourself from leadership and let a new person run for PM. The last thing the Trudeau brand needs is to be remembered as a pompous, arrogant bunch who did not get the message that it is time to move on and let another breed of politician take the reins. It's bye by time sir, simple, straightforward. Your time is up, you're done. Be proud of what you accomplished, move on because if you do not, you will be ousted by the electorate in a humiliating defeat and your party could suffer for a long time because of your ambition. Be fair to you and fair to your team and this great country you have served well, move on!