The question of relevance is popping up as there has been some controversy surrounding the current and last Governor General of Canada. Julie Payette had to step down from the role after an audit found that she had created a toxic work environment. The current, Mary Simon, cannot speak Canada's second official language very well, French has been her issue, and it's not pretty when events are cancelled because you cannot speak one of the official languages. Now I will say my French is not perfect, it is pretty basic to be honest, but I am not the GG. Mary Simon is, and apparently her French is horrid. To be fair, she is much older and as one ages, things like a new language are challenging to pick up. But, it has been 3 years and not much progress has been made, and it's a glaring issue. You have to know French to be in the role. This is the same for many government positions, especially at the federal level.
There is one slight problem with leaving the monarchy in our dust here in Canada, that is the fact that our constitution is deeply connected to the crown. In an article by CTV News, the following quote was made.
"I think it would be very difficult, "Allan Hutchinson(opens in a new tab), a legal theorist and law professor at York University, told CTVNews.ca." Any change in the arrangements around the Crown would require the unanimity of all provinces and the federal government. The chances of getting that are not good."Provinces like Alberta are very pro-Crown, while Quebec is not, which in turn means the Governor General is really liked in Alberta and in Quebec, not really. So the notion of just going ahead and ridding ourselves of the Crown will not be realized for quite some time, if at all. The key question is this, is the Governor General and the Crown really relevant in Canada, and can Canada make due without them? The answer is no and yes. No, the crown is really not relevant in Canada, the Governor General has a minimal but, important role in Canada. The most significant of the powers they have is to give Royal assent to laws and to dissolve and offer the winner of an election the right to form government. Outside of these and a few other things they do, the role is ceremonial in nature. So we could generally do without them. As for relevance, mostly historical and ceremonial. Canada, like many nations, has traditions and ties back to their origin and Canada's origins are from Britain as it was once a colony of Britain. The Crown and Governor General are not just leaders but role models, and it's an expectation that they will lead by example and provide a means for Canadians to unite behind ideas specific to national unity. So in this case there is relevance in their role. The problem is tarnished reputation due to bad behavior or lack of skill, not to mention a dislike of some members of the Royal Family. Divorces, the death of Dianna Princes of Wales, the feuding between members of the Royal Family do not help with relevance. Add to that what happened with Julie Payette and the fact that our current GG has trouble with French. Along with the fact that some previous GGs have more or less phoned it in does not help the image re relevance of the office.
So how do we change that, outside changing the Constitution and electing our GG? The best thing is for the Prime Minister to start thinking about who really fits the role. The person they select should be mature enough to handle the job, speak both official languages, have a desire to serve and be humble enough to realize that while they have an important role. They are there to showcase Canada and the people of Canada to the world. And lastly, they are to be frugal with the government's purse. Remembering that Canadian taxpayers foot the bill for them, so they should respect that and bring value to the role as well.
The Governor General will be around for quite some time, so they must remain relevant, focused and well-rounded people willing to serve and equipped to do so. The PM did not make a bad choice in selecting Mary Simon to be the GG. But, was it the best choice? I would say not really. The poor woman has been plagued by nasty comments, and having to defend her lack of French has not helped. A nice idea that essentially kind of makes the office of Governor General look stupid and out of touch with a fundamental value. That is that we operate as a diverse society, and this includes being able to at some levels speak both French and English. Having to deal with this ruins the fact that she is indigenous and is very well-rounded and skilled in many facets, including diplomacy and advocacy. Mary Simon has an interesting backstory and actually could have done even better in this role had she picked up her French language skills. She will probably go down as one of those GGs that was not great but, not terrible. That will affect the view of the office of the GG for some time unless the next person to hold the office really brings the A game to the role. But, it starts with the PM who chooses the next GG, he really sets the tone and can elevate or deflate the office with that choice. In turn, making the office of the Governor General relevant or not.
I have a video on my YouTube Channel, Candid Conversations Zoomed In and Video Comments, that explains the role of the Governor General. Simply titled The Governor General.
There have been lots of scandals in royal circles, History.com has some of the biggest of all including but for our purpose you can dive into ‘Annus Horribilis’: Why Queen Elizabeth II Called 1992 a Horrible Year. The Governor General of Canada at that time was Ramon John Hnatyshyn. Never heard of him until now but, I bet he was not happy with what was going on with the Crown at the time. Remember a GG represents the Crown, so ya it looked bad in 92 for both the Crown and GG.
Ipsos did a poll on the question of the relevance of the Crown, which also goes to the relevance of the Governor General by association. Canadians Conflicted on Future Role of Monarchy, as Half (54%) Say Canada Should End Ties to Monarchy.
