Candid Comment - The Governor General - Relevant or Not?

Canada is a modern country with old traditions attached to its political systems, namely the office of the Governor General. Since 1867, Canada has had a Governor General representing the king or queen of England as head of state and the armed forces. There are lieutenant Governor Generals in each of the provinces of Canada. That said, let's just focus on the federal GG, shall we? 

The question of relevance is popping up as there has been some controversy surrounding the current and last Governor General of Canada. Julie Payette had to step down from the role after an audit found that she had created a toxic work environment. The current, Mary Simon, cannot speak Canada's second official language very well, French has been her issue, and it's not pretty when events are cancelled because you cannot speak one of the official languages. Now I will say my French is not perfect, it is pretty basic to be honest, but I am not the GG. Mary Simon is, and apparently her French is horrid. To be fair, she is much older and as one ages, things like a new language are challenging to pick up. But, it has been 3 years and not much progress has been made, and it's a glaring issue. You have to know French to be in the role. This is the same for many government positions, especially at the federal level.

The question begging to be answered is as follows. Does having a Constitutional Monarchy matter in our modern era? Many Canadians feel that it is time to leave the Commonwealth and ditch the King and with him the Governor General. Opting to become a republic and having an elected head of state is a question that has been asked, and polling suggests that a large number of Canadians do want to see a change. Many see the monarchy as antiquated and irrelevant, a waste of money and time. It does not help that in the last two Governors General have had a significant controversy follow them. Payette with the toxic attitude, Simon with the inability to grasp French.

There is one slight problem with leaving the monarchy in our dust here in Canada, that is the fact that our constitution is deeply connected to the crown. In an article by CTV News, the following quote was made.

"I think it would be very difficult, "Allan Hutchinson(opens in a new tab), a legal theorist and law professor at York University, told CTVNews.ca." Any change in the arrangements around the Crown would require the unanimity of all provinces and the federal government. The chances of getting that are not good."

Provinces like Alberta are very pro-Crown, while Quebec is not, which in turn means the Governor General is really liked in Alberta and in Quebec, not really. So the notion of just going ahead and ridding ourselves of the Crown will not be realized for quite some time, if at all. The key question is this, is the Governor General and the Crown really relevant in Canada, and can Canada make due without them? The answer is no and yes. No, the crown is really not relevant in Canada, the Governor General has a minimal but, important role in Canada. The most significant of the powers they have is to give Royal assent to laws and to dissolve and offer the winner of an election the right to form government. Outside of these and a few other things they do, the role is ceremonial in nature. So we could generally do without them. As for relevance, mostly historical and ceremonial. Canada, like many nations, has traditions and ties back to their origin and Canada's origins are from Britain as it was once a colony of Britain. The Crown and Governor General are not just leaders but role models, and it's an expectation that they will lead by example and provide a means for Canadians to unite behind ideas specific to national unity. So in this case there is relevance in their role. The problem is tarnished reputation due to bad behavior or lack of skill, not to mention a dislike of some members of the Royal Family. Divorces, the death of Dianna Princes of Wales, the feuding between members of the Royal Family do not help with relevance. Add to that what happened with Julie Payette and the fact that our current GG has trouble with French. Along with the fact that some previous GGs have more or less phoned it in does not help the image re relevance of the office. 

So how do we change that, outside changing the Constitution and electing our GG? The best thing is for the Prime Minister to start thinking about who really fits the role. The person they select should be mature enough to handle the job, speak both official languages, have a desire to serve and be humble enough to realize that while they have an important role. They are there to showcase Canada and the people of Canada to the world. And lastly, they are to be frugal with the government's purse. Remembering that Canadian taxpayers foot the bill for them, so they should respect that and bring value to the role as well. 

The Governor General will be around for quite some time, so they must remain relevant, focused and well-rounded people willing to serve and equipped to do so. The PM did not make a bad choice in selecting Mary Simon to be the GG. But, was it the best choice? I would say not really. The poor woman has been plagued by nasty comments, and having to defend her lack of French has not helped. A nice idea that essentially kind of makes the office of Governor General look stupid and out of touch with a fundamental value. That is that we operate as a diverse society, and this includes being able to at some levels speak both French and English. Having to deal with this ruins the fact that she is indigenous and is very well-rounded and skilled in many facets, including diplomacy and advocacy. Mary Simon has an interesting backstory and actually could have done even better in this role had she picked up her French language skills. She will probably go down as one of those GGs that was not great but, not terrible. That will affect the view of the office of the GG for some time unless the next person to hold the office really brings the A game to the role. But, it starts with the PM who chooses the next GG, he really sets the tone and can elevate or deflate the office with that choice. In turn, making the office of the Governor General relevant or not. 

I have a video on my YouTube Channel, Candid Conversations Zoomed In and Video Comments, that explains the role of the Governor General. Simply titled The Governor General.

There have been lots of scandals in royal circles, History.com has some of the biggest of all including but for our purpose you can dive into ‘Annus Horribilis’: Why Queen Elizabeth II Called 1992 a Horrible Year. The Governor General of Canada at that time was Ramon John Hnatyshyn. Never heard of him until now but, I bet he was not happy with what was going on with the Crown at the time. Remember a GG represents the Crown, so ya it looked bad in 92 for both the Crown and GG.

CTV News Article: Why it would be 'virtually impossible' for Canada to drop the monarchy

Ipsos did a poll on the question of the relevance of the Crown, which also goes to the relevance of the Governor General by association. Canadians Conflicted on Future Role of Monarchy, as Half (54%) Say Canada Should End Ties to Monarchy.

Candid Comment - Hubcaps Why? Why Do We Need Them?

I do not know why this subject popped in to my head it just did, but it is a good topic. Why do, what is the purpose and the reason for hubcaps? Well, let's explore this topic, it's fun, and it's also informative because, as I found it out, there is a good reason for having hubcaps on your car's wheels. 

One purpose of Hubcaps, they complete the look of the vehicle, they decorate and give the vehicle a finished look. Decorative, they make the vehicle look complete and ready to go no matter whether it is a car, van, truck or bus, the hubcap is the final touch that completes the process of building the vehicle. However, they are more than Just Aesthetic accessories. Hubcaps actually serve a purpose.

When most people think of hubcaps, it’s easy to dismiss them as mere decorative elements of a vehicle. However, their purpose extends far beyond enhancing a car’s aesthetics. Hubcaps, also known as wheel covers, are essential components of a vehicle’s wheel system that serve both functional and aesthetic roles. So here we go with a bit of dive into the reasons hubcaps more than things to pretty up the ride.

1. Protection from Debris and Damage

One of the primary functions of hubcaps is to protect the wheel assembly from dust, dirt, and debris. They act as a barrier, safeguarding the wheel, lug nuts, and brake components from road contaminants that could cause corrosion, rust, or damage over time. This protective feature is especially important for vehicles subjected to harsh driving conditions, such as off-roading or areas with significant road construction. Not to mention climates that are arid or wet. One prime example of the risk of damage that can be caused is having to drive in Canadian winters. The snow, and salt that is mixed in to clear ice as well as snow can damage the wheel system, so the hubcap minimizes that.

Additionally, hubcaps can help prevent damage from small rocks and other debris that might otherwise chip or scratch the surface of the wheel. By providing this layer of protection, hubcaps can contribute to the longevity and durability of the wheel assembly.

2. Aerodynamics and Fuel Efficiency

Hubcaps can also play a role in improving a vehicle's aerodynamics. By creating a smoother surface for the wheel assembly, they reduce air resistance as the vehicle moves. This reduced drag can translate to improved fuel efficiency, especially in larger vehicles or those designed for performance. Manufacturers often consider the design of hubcaps alongside the overall aerodynamics of the vehicle to maximize fuel economy and performance.

3. Heat Dissipation

The performance of braking systems is critical for vehicle safety, and the design of hubcaps can contribute to effective heat dissipation. The materials used and the configuration of ventilated hubcaps can help channel airflow around the wheel, assisting in the cooling of the brake components. This is particularly important for high-performance vehicles that generate significant heat during braking. Think of trucks, buses, ambulances, fire, and police vehicles. Unlike your car, unless you drive for Uber, these vehicles are constantly on the move, and in some cases endure conditions that can cause damage to the wheel assembly, especially the braking system.

4. Visual Appeal and Customization

While functionality is vital, there is no denying the aesthetic aspect of hubcaps. They are available in countless designs, colors, and finishes, allowing car owners to customize the look of their vehicles. From sleek, modern designs to classic, vintage styles, hubcaps can reflect the owner’s personality and preferences, enhancing the overall appearance of the vehicle.

In some cases, car manufacturers release special edition vehicles with unique hubcap designs to celebrate anniversaries or partnerships, further emphasizing the significance of hubcaps in branding and visual identity.

5. Concealing Brake Components

Hubcaps can also serve to conceal brake components, including calipers and rotors, which can be visually unappealing. By covering these parts, hubcaps contribute to a cleaner, more uniform look for the wheel area. This is especially important for vehicles where aesthetics play a critical role, such as luxury cars and sports coupes.

6. Cost-Effective Maintenance

For car owners, hubcaps can also provide a cost-effective solution for wheel maintenance. Instead of purchasing new wheels to replace damaged ones, a new set of hubcaps can provide a fresh look and extended protection to the underlying wheels. This can be particularly beneficial for budget-conscious drivers looking to maintain their vehicles without incurring significant expenses.
Conclusion

hubcaps are often treated as decorations, nothing more, nothing less by most drivers. But as noted above, they do have a practical application. They offer protection from damage, enhance aerodynamics, assist in heat dissipation, and play a significant role in customizable vehicle aesthetics. 

As vehicles continue to evolve, the design and functionality of hubcaps will remain relevant, serving both the driver’s needs and the creative vision of automotive designers. Understanding the diverse purposes of hubcaps can help you as a driver. By understanding that they are more than mere decorative features of a vehicle, you will be able to make a more informed decision about what car is most suited to your needs. A car is more than just it's engine and good gas mileage, those are important. But you should consider, comfort, reliability, safety features and yes, efficiencies and the maintenance of the vehicle, including the wheels. Hence, making sure that you have a good set of hubcaps on the wheels to ensure that the wheels are protected and maintain aerodynamics, as well as completing the look of your ride. 

Weirdness in Politics - Quirky Characters And Their Antics Impact - This Edition of Candid Comments

 

Politics has always been a stage where in certain circumstances dramatic personalities and eccentric behaviors are seen. Across the ages, various individuals emerge, each bringing us their unique flavor to the political landscape. While many politicians strive for professionalism, there is a substantial number of so-called “weirdos” who’ve made a mark, shaking up the norms, bending rules, and occasionally sending observers into fits of laughter (or bewilderment). These characters prove that politics can be as unpredictable and colorful.

The Eccentric Politician Archetype

Historically, the world of politics has been filled with figures who defy convention. From Henry VIII’s notorious excesses to the flamboyant oratory of Winston Churchill, the quirky nuances of these leaders often become a part of their legacy. But what constitutes “weirdness” in politics? Typically, it is defined by the actions and words of politicians who operate outside the typical boundaries of political discourse or engage in unusual behavior that captivates public attention in humorous and horrific ways.

Take, for example, the case of the late Italian Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi, who was as well-known for his controversial reality TV shows as he was for his political manoeuvres. His brash comments, penchant for drama, and larger-than-life personality exemplify how a so-called “weirdo” can dominate headlines, for better or worse.

The Rise of Outsider Candidates

Lately, the rise of outsider candidates has redefined our perception of political oddities. Figures like Donald Trump in the U.S. and Boris Johnson in the U.K. have thrust themselves into the political limelight, not for their adherence to traditional political norms, but for their outlandish styles and often inflammatory statements. Their unpredictable behavior and unconventional approaches have appealed to disenchanted voters seeking change, illustrating how “weirdness” can garner significant support by bucking tradition.

Social media has only amplified this trend. Platforms like Twitter and TikTok have become the breeding ground for political antics, making it easier than ever for politicians to share their offbeat thoughts, whether they’re making bizarre memes or engaging in improbable debates. This new political landscape blurs the lines between celebrity culture and serious governance, inviting a wider array of personalities into the ring.

The Comedic Touch

Sometimes, weirdness in politics takes a comedic turn. Many political figures employ humor—not always successfully—to connect with their constituents. Take former U.S. Senator Al Franken, who famously transitioned from a successful comedy career on “Saturday Night Live” to politics. His humor initially gave him a unique platform but also contributed to his swift fall from grace amidst allegations of misconduct.

Then there are politicians like Kenneth “Ken” Livingstone in the U.K., known for his peculiar yet amusing quotes, which have led to both laughter and outrage. His unconventional approaches and unapologetic honesty transformed the perception of what an elected official could be, highlighting the balance between serious governance and an engaging public persona.

The Consequences of Weirdness

However, it’s not all fun and games. The rise of eccentric characters in politics can have significant consequences. Sometimes, the tweet that goes viral leads to personifying serious issues in ways that undermine meaningful discourse. Politicians risk trivializing critical subjects through humor or oddity, diverting attention from actual policy discussions. Additionally, the normalization of bizarre behavior may lower the standards for political decorum.

Moreover, the phenomenon of so-called “weirdos” can lead to polarization. Politicians who thrive on shock value may further entrench divisions within societies, appealing to the “us vs. them” mindset. This tactic risks abandoning pragmatic solutions and fostering animosity, which ultimately can destabilize governance.

Conclusion

“weirdness” in politics represents a fascinating mix of innovation and unpredictability. Whether those who are offbeat are shaking up norms, offering comic relief, or creating controversy, these figures play a crucial role in shaping the political landscape. Their impact can ultimately drive voter engagement, inspire change, and challenge conventional wisdom. Yet, as society embraces the quirks and oddities of political personalities, it’s essential to remember the importance of accountability, integrity, and substance in governance. As we navigate through the peculiar politics of our time, it’s vital to discern the line where eccentricity enriches discourse versus where it detracts from the serious challenges that face our global society.

Candid Comment: The True Cost of Experiencing Live Sports: A Winnipeg Jets vs. Toronto Maple Leafs Dilemma

As a die-hard fan of the Winnipeg Jets, the thrill of attending a live game has always been a dream. The electrifying atmosphere, the roar of the crowd, and the excitement of seeing the team battle it out on the ice create memories that last a lifetime. And when it comes to a matchup between the Winnipeg Jets and the Toronto Maple Leafs, the coolness factor to seeing them play live kicks in. However, recently, my enthusiasm was quickly dampened by a harsh reality: the soaring cost of tickets. The allure of the Jets vs. Maple Leafs Showdown seems just too expensive to consider, no matter how much I want to jump in and go to the game in Toronto when the Jets are in town.

The Winnipeg Jets have built a passionate fan base since their return to the NHL in 2011. The team’s recent successes, paired with their competitive spirit, has ignited the interest of many local national, and even some international fans, myself included. When the schedule was released, and I noticed the Jets were set to play the Toronto Maple Leafs just before Christmas this year — one of the most storied franchises in hockey history — I was ecstatic. It was a chance to witness a game between two excellent teams. However, my excitement took a nosedive when I looked into purchasing tickets. The Sticker Shock was a hard hitter. For the cheapest seats, ones where you need binoculars to see what is going on during the game, 179 was the asking price. Want to be near the glass 1,000 dollars, that is nuts! The prices are staggering. Even the upper-tier seats are overpriced to the point that it is hard to digest. Yet people actually pay these ridiculous amounts to see a game. I pity the dad who brings his family to watch a game. By the end of the night, the spend on tickets, food, transport to and from the game will be at least 700 or 800 dollars. That is for just one child and another adult! Imagine what the cost would be for a set of seats near the glass, and like I said, people pay these prices.

A range between $100 and $1000—or more—per ticket. For many fans, especially those of us on a budget, this amount is simply untenable. The disconnect between fans and live sports is definitely a reality. This dilemma is not unique to me, nor is it confined to the Winnipeg Jets or the Toronto Maple Leafs. Across the NHL and even other professional sports leagues, the skyrocketing costs of attending games have raised concerns about accessibility. An evening out to watch a game, which once felt like an affordable luxury, has morphed into a financial burden for many fans. 

While teams need to generate revenue and cover operational expenses, it appears that a balance has been lost. When ticket prices soar, the very essence of what makes attending live sports special—the community spirit and shared experiences—dwindles. For many families and individuals, the option of cheering from the couch with friends and snacks has become more appealing than battling the financial strain of live attendance. In short, it appears that sport, including hockey, has become a playground for the rich. You have to have a large sum of cash to even think about going to a game.

Finding Value in Sports, how can that be done? As I contemplated my experience with shopping for a ticket, I realized that sports fandom is about more than just attending games. It’s about community, loyalty, and passion for the game. While the dream of watching the Jets take on the Maple Leafs live in Toronto may have slipped away due to financial constraints, my love for hockey and support for the Jets remains steadfast. Perhaps I’ll join other fans in watching the game from a local pub or gather with friends for a viewing party at home, where the drinks and snacks won’t break the bank. Quantity and quality of experience often trump the mere act of being physically present at the game.

And if I had the opportunity to sit with the league's honchos and team owners, I probably would suggest a redo on how to encourage the so-called blue color fans to come back to see games live. But, alas, I don't really think they are interested in hearing from such fans, at least that is my impression.

As the Jets embark on another season, the fervor, and excitement will undoubtedly continue to thrive. Even if I can’t watch them live at the Scotia Bank Arena, I’ll still be celebrating each goal, each hit, and each victory from wherever I find myself. After all, real sports fans know that it’s the love of the game and our connection to our teams that ultimately prove invaluable—ticket prices notwithstanding.

Candid Comment - Rents Are Ridiculous!

Renting in Canada has become ridiculous. Most of Canada's cities have seen rents increase to ridiculous amounts for spaces that in some cases are so small a person can barely move around in them. It has gotten to the point now where many people are either moving in with family or are having to consider a roommate. Just getting a place is absurd, in every province, except Quebec, renters are required to give the landlord 2 months rent up front and in some provinces, like Alberta, other deposits are required. 

In general, you are not going to find a place for less than 1000. In fact, anything under this is usually what a person is charging for a room. Room rentals have also become a thing. Many people are doing this and, here is the kicker, at least in Ontario. Those renting out rooms ALSO want first and last month's rent and also run credit checks! Imagine that, to rent a ROOM! How did we get here?

The first place to look at is regulation, or the lack of it, and the desire to do nothing about it. Ontario, where I live, has almost become a free for all zone for landlords. No rental controls for buildings built after 2018, the idea that you can force people to submit to a credit check for every rental application. The ridiculous request for the first and last month of rent and in some cases a deposit are what incentivizes people to get into the business of renting. Another way that rents have gone through the roof, pardon the pun, is the use of renovations to evict a tenant. The idea is this, inform the tenant they have to leave for a renovation to take place, then when the tenant is gone. Poof, never mind the reno is not needed, up goes the rent and the tenant who left is out of a home. Another way landlords are using the law to get tenants out and increase rent is to ask for the unit to be vacated for a family member, well, well, well. So uncle Joe is going to move in, or is he? In most cases, he is not, again up goes the rent happy landlord, unhoused person. Is it any wonder why we have tent cities across Canada? Then there is the short-term rental issue.

Ah yes, short-term rentals. I have to admit, I like them. And I have no problem with the concept. They provide a great way for someone to make some money to pay for rent or the mortgage. The concern is when people by a home for that sole purpose. Or build a home for the sole purpose of making money as a short-term renter. It gets even more messy when an owner of a low rise decides to rent out apartments as short-term rental units. 

So what can we do to fix this? Certainly tent cities are not the answer, and yet it appears that governments are more or less shrugging their shoulders and saying, let the police handle them by essentially doing little to nothing to fix it. You see, the poor and disabled are not interesting enough to politicians. They do not vote and, for the most part, do not pay any kind of tax. Letting the police handle them is just as dumb as doing nothing. Police do not have the time or proper resources to go chasing after the homless all the time. Frankly, it is not what taxpayers pay them to do. So the answer has to come in the form of action that makes sense. 

Here are some ideas that might help in dealing with this issue. 

1. Those renovations, prove that it is needed. Some cities like Hamilton, Ontario are putting bylaws that now require that. Toronto, one of Canada's largest cities, is also looking at a bylaw.

2. Again, looking at Hamilton, the city has taken the approach that regulation is key to managing housing. Tackling Short-Term Rentals by creating a bylaw that requires a license to operate and only allows a guest to stay up to 28 days. This means those who use sites to list their second home on short term rental sites have to have a license, and this also applies to a person who rents out a room on the site. Toronto also has such a bylaw, and it is being beefed up.

3. Another thing that needs to go is the notion of paying last month's rent. Across Canada, except in Quebec, renters are required to fork out the first and last month's rent. In an era of high rents, the idea of asking people to put out 2 months of rent is offensive. It's bad enough that in each attempt to rent, a person has to provide credit checks for each application. Which by the way can wreck credit scores. So axing the deposit, which is what the last month's rent is, should be a no-brainer but, again, the government just shrugs its shoulders and says meh. But, meh won't work anymore, and axing the deposit is the best way to give more breathing space to people who are looking for an apartment or home to rent.

4. Ah, and what about our fictional uncle Joe, who the landlord says he needs your unit for? That may be a real thing but, in most case's uncle Joe is never going to take possession. Really, would you charge your family member 2k a month to rent your basement or one of your apartments? So creating a rule or set of them might be in order. That prevents people from using the family member needs to have a home loophole to rent the unit at a higher rate to a new person. It's not unfair to ask for proof that the person who is a family member is going to live in the unit. Some affidavit or other proof, this is a reasonable ask. Even the possibility of banning renting to a family for certain types of rental units, like those in a high rise, are options that should be explored. Maybe it may be a good idea to show that indeed uncle Joe is paying full rent, yep the whole 2k for up to a year. With the requirement that the landlord aka the niece or nephew of uncle Joe has to show statements that they are indeed paying rent to live in the unit just like any other renter. After a year, good ole uncle Joe can then pay a smaller amount or 0. The point is to close the loophole and ensure that there is a real relative living there, not a new tenant paying 3 or 4k for the unit.

5. Reforming landlord tenant boards. In particular, the one in Ontario is a critical, just about every filing requires an intervention by the board via a hearing. There are cases that come before the board that should never have made it to a hearing stage. It might be a good idea to look at what the board does and consider the various orders it receives filings for and how they are managed. But, again, the government does not want or care to do it. That has lead to a massive increase in the backlog of cases and is costing everyone involved in the process. The solution may require new hires and less political appointments for buddies and supporters of the premier, a look at what is a serious vs. a not so serious case and throwing out some cases altogether may be the answer. To be fair, not all landlords are crooked, money grubbing people. They are also stuck in a bad situation with having to deal with tenants who do not pay the rent, refuse to leave, and damage property. But, the majority want to hang on and stay where they are because there is simply no place apart from the park, parking lots, shelters, and under bridges in a tent. Is that really acceptable? No. 

It is time to embrace innovative approaches, add regulation and get the politics and business mentality adjusted so that the issue of housing can be addressed. Simply put, this can no longer continue to be the norm and the divisive nature of housing is only leading to the risk of more and more clashes between tenants and landlords along with the unhoused. It just takes one spark to start a fire and the whole thing blows up, which technically is what has happened here.

The answer ls not just more housing but, better management of the rules surrounding tenancy and the implementation of rules and regulations to underpin the value of each person's right to a home. It's time to recognize the unhoused and the tenants as stakeholders and to invite them into the process to make the changes needed. And it is time for governments to stop playing politics and start doing it's part to resolve the issue.

Below are some additional resources you can review that relate to this topic.

The Monitor has an excellent article that addresses Ontario Rent Control.

Want to learn more about rent control policy in Canada. Visit the Canadian Centre for Housing Rights site. They have an article about rent control across Canada.

Candid Comment - Time To Go Joe - Bye Bye Trudeau

In North America, there are two leaders facing some serious pushback from their citizens as well as within their respective parties. They are, of course, Justin Trudeau of Canada and Joe Biden of the U.S.  These two leaders are desperately trying to hold on to power for different reasons. But, the bottom line is their respective sands of time are fast running out. The clock on their time in the office they hold is about to chime midnight, and the exit stage looms large. Both still want to continue in their roles. 

While it is noble to want to continue to serve, it's just as noble to know when your service is done. Understanding that there is a time to say I am done, the work is finished, is just as important as continuing on in a role. The problem is that these two gentlemen do not realize, or maybe they do not want to realize, that the best before date has long since been passed on their time in office. Now it is time to hang it up and ride off into the sunset or to the next thing. Each has done well in office, Mr. Trudeau helped Canada through the pandemic, and Joe Biden restored stability in America after the years of the three - ring circus that was the Trump presidency.

It is understandable that Joe Biden wants to ensure another Trump defeat, after all, the U.S. did not look so good during the years that the Donald was in office. And for Mr. Trudeau, the idea of setting a record and winning another election is not wrong, we all have goals and want to see if we can achieve them, and Trudeau is no different. But, knowing when to end it is just as important as knowing when to continue. 

For Joe Biden, it is the age factor and that horrible debate he had. It was crystal clear that he just does not have the mental capacity to lead the United States. Simply put, Mr. Biden is not fit for the role. There is no reason to dive deeper into why this is, it's clear his mental capabilities are diminished, and he cannot function at the level needed to do the job. Being old is not a crime, nor is it a bad thing. But, one needs to come to terms with the reality that they can no longer cut it in certain aspects of life due to age and health constraints. Being brave enough to admit that and let others help you or knowing it is time to leave your role and move on to the next thing or just ride off into the sunset and enjoy retirement. These are signs that you are mature enough to know when to go on and when to stop and pivot away to the next thing. This is what Joe Biden has to take to heart and understand. It's time to go, Joe, it's time to go.

As for Mr. Trudeau, politics can be rough and there are times when sticking it out is very much the thing to do. This is not one of them. The polls widely suggest a change is in order, and pride needs to be set aside, sure it would be cool to win another election, to extend the Trudeau legacy. Buddy, this isn't it. Time is up, and the electorate have made it obvious that the Liberal reign is coming to an end if you stay on. The only true way to see your party continue in power, possibly, is to remove yourself from leadership and let a new person run for PM. The last thing the Trudeau brand needs is to be remembered as a pompous, arrogant bunch who did not get the message that it is time to move on and let another breed of politician take the reins. It's bye by time sir, simple, straightforward. Your time is up, you're done. Be proud of what you accomplished, move on because if you do not, you will be ousted by the electorate in a humiliating defeat and your party could suffer for a long time because of your ambition. Be fair to you and fair to your team and this great country you have served well, move on!

Candid Comment - The Art Of Balance And AI

Welcome back, I recently heard a story about the pope being concerned about AI. The tech certainly has its pros and cons. It's also worth noting that at this time, humans control the tech. Couple this with social media and other communication tools like text and phone calls as well as the media and a question of balance comes into the conversation. AI is here to stay but, it is not a living thing like we are. It is a tool, a piece of tech that can bridge ideas and with technologies and enhance lives, it can also create a mess. To give you an idea of what I mean, take a look at some of the photos found via Google of the Pope. Bizarre is the only word that applies to these photos. Just as bizarre as having a dog with 20 legs, which by the way you can create with AI. Mind you, that would work well in a sci-fi flick, but in real life no. Ai has other problems too. It dreams up things that are not true and spits out bias and inaccurate information. So why does that happen.

AI is a creation of humans, humans are by nature a fallible bunch, we screw up. We also have bias built in from our history, ala our parents. The people behind AI have created a tech that goes out into the world, so to speak, and gathers data. That data can get polluted by information that is inaccurate and biased. Moreover, humans can influence the output AI offers, we can tell it to do something like create a dog with 7 heads, and it will do that. However, we can also ask it to provide feedback on a subject and that info can be returned in an inaccurate manner because the machine sometimes guesses and offers what is in its estimation is the best answer.

AI can be useful, but there needs to be a balance. The human touch needs to be there to ensure that the AI actually does what it is intended to and offers the most accurate data to the end user. There are many ways AI can be effectively used. For example, I asked ChatGPT where the most affordable place to live is re rents in Canada. Now the data it based answers on is 2 years old, but, apparently Winnipeg tops the list, ah ya nice city, but very cold in winter and hot muggy and buggy in the summer. I will pass. Now I asked about and got back answers based on questions related to data from statistics. A person can get AI to write a book, but it may not be the best authored or feature things that the writer did not intend to showcase.

Ai is great at helping plan create and organize, but not so great beyond that. So really it should be used as a tool to do things that relate to doing the organizing, creating a plan or create and idea or thing. We then should take that info and build the creation, use the organized things as intended and follow the plan laid out. AI also needs to be placed in the background, and it should be carefully monitored and managed. The point simply put is that we should not lean on AI to solve all our problems and do all of our tasks. We are thinking beings, and we should use our brain power along with the tech to solve problems, plan and organize our lives. Being lazy is not healthy, and AI will get us into that unhealthy lifestyle if we let it. Something to think about, wouldn't you agree? 

Hey, please keep in mind there is a YouTube channel I have called Candid Conversations, Zoomed in and Comments Videos. Take a look at the comments and conversations I have posted there. See you soon, and thanks again for reading this blog.

By the way, there was new coverage about the Pope's reaction to AI.

Candid Comment - Caring For Prisoners In The Hospital

Media reports that Robert Pickton, a serial killer, was stabbed in the head Sunday, leaving the 74-year-old in critical condition. The incident happened at the Port Cartier Institution. The prison is located north of the city of Port Cartier and is about 400 miles (ca. 644 km) from Quebec City. A 51-year-old inmate is under arrest and charges are pending, re the outcome for Pickton.

What is interesting about this case for me is the fact that he has to be treated like any other patient who comes into the hospital. It begs the question of how do doctors and nurses deal with the fact that they are treating someone who has done an evil thing. Pickton, serving a life sentence for murder. Convicted on 6 counts, he is also responsible for over 30 more victims, most indigenous women.

So what does one do knowing the person is an inmate, or has committed a crime and is in the emerg awaiting treatment?

In the case of Pickton, people on staff at the hospital would have an idea of who he is and what he did. Therefore, they would have to do their best to think more in terms of treating an illness or injury rather than the person. If they do not know the person, they would probably be well advised to not look up the person online, to avoid finding out what they did. In other words, just treat the person and leave it at that. Doctors and nurses should try to stay neutral in their approach to the patient, and this is especially true re an inmate. Do no harm is the creed of the medical staff, and sticking to that rule is the prime mission. Tough to do but, a must when dealing with prisoners and those who are brought in for treatment accused of a crime. In the US, a 2009 report, published in the American Journal of Public Health, unearthed some worrisome stats:

Among inmates with a persistent medical problem, 13.9% of federal inmates, 20.1% of state inmates, and 68.4% of local jail inmates had received no medical examination since incarceration.

Prior to incarceration, slightly more than 1 in 7 inmates were taking a prescription medication for an active medical problem routinely requiring medication (as defined in the Methods section). Of these, 3314 federal (20.9%), 43 679 state (24.3%), and 28 473 local jail inmates (36.5%) stopped the medication following incarceration.

Only a small portion of prison inmates (3.9% of federal and 6.4% of state inmates) with an active medical problem for which laboratory monitoring is routinely indicated had not undergone at least 1 blood test since incarceration. However, most local jail inmates with such a condition (60.1% [*SE = 1.8%]) had not undergone a blood test.

Following serious injury, 650 federal inmates (7.7%), 12 997 state inmates (12.0%), and, 3183 local jail inmates (24.7%) were not seen by medical personnel.

I was unable to find any information on Canadian prisoners. In fact, the available data is poor or almost non-existent, largely due to privacy regulation. I did find a link to data on the National Library of Medicine that does review health data, but again it is not robust.

I do not envy doctors and nurses who have to deal with offenders. The job is difficult enough as it is now they have to handle a man or woman who has a criminal record. Looping back to Pickton. Here is a man who has been seriously wounded, possibly mortally, though he is still clinging to life. How does the staff at the hospital treat a man who killed over 30 women without feeling something, especially those on staff who are women? I do not know, how they would but, they are and do treat offenders. My guess from what I am reading is they try to focus on the patient in the sense of need. He requires treatment, therefore treat him nothing more, nothing less. Keep as much focus possible on the medical application re his care rather than the emotional side of the care. 

Most Canadians, including some victims families, really do not care if he dies and would not mind if it was painful. But, staff in the hospital have to take a different approach. They do need to try to save his life, and they do need to do what they can to relieve his pain. That is the tough part of the job. The best thing we as nonmedical personnel can do is support them. Thank them for doing what is most certainly an unpleasant part of their job, treating someone not many want to see live or be free of pain.

As always, thanks for taking time to read the content on this site, your input is welcome, please remember to be respectful and not engage in behavior that can be deemed offensive or hate inspired. Such commentary will be removed, and your ISP may receive a report about your conduct. I reserve the right to edit or remove content that is deemed to be inappropriate.

*SE most likely a reference to State Equivalence.

Candid Comment - Understanding The Bible

Hello, it has been some time since I logged an entry here. I have been dealing with medical issues and other changes. But I can get back into blogging, YouTube, and podcasting as things are improving.

For those who do not know, I am a Christian. Well, I call myself one. I am not the best at the lifestyle, but I do try to live it. One of the things a person who follows the faith does is read the Bible. Christians are supposed to also ask for guidance from the Holy Spirit to gain insight into the meaning of scriptures and how to actually apply them to one's life. The Bible does encourage participation. James 1:22-26, for example, gives clear guidance to do what the Bible says. Now, one must remember that the Bible has many parts to it that touch on things that we may want to clarify before doing. 

One example of this is the scripture that talks about cutting off limbs to avoid sin. Matthew 5:29–30 is the scripture I am referring to. This is literal, meaning Jesus actually preached this. But it is also spiritual in nature as well. The sin of adultery was so serious in Jesus's view that he wanted people to understand its consequences, including going to hell. So he suggested that it would be better to have lost a foot, a hand, or an eye to be tossed into hell whole for the sin. Now, this is a grave and dangerous thing to do. Cutting a limb would lead to one's death. Never do this. Do not do it; you will die. Many people at the time Jesus walked the earth probably did this and probably ended up dead. While literal, this scripture is also meant to be read this way: Cut the thing that is causing you to sin away. Like porn or booze, cut that if you're walking to see it and do it. It is hard to do, but with some help from friends, family, and the Lord, you can. It just takes work. Lots of it. This scripture is hyperbole. It's meant to show how serious sin is, especially sin like messing with another man's wife.

Another well-known scripture is about an eye for an eye. What does this mean? Well, simply put, it is meant to say to use equal force. Exodus 21:24–25 speaks about this, and there is a footnote listed in the scripture linked. It was the law that equal force be applied, so if someone broke a bone, the punishment was that person's bone would be broken; if you killed them, then you lost your life. However, in the New Testament, Jesus flipped this; in Matthew 5:38–40, he openly suggests not to retaliate. In fact, he recommends we do the right thing, go the extra mile, and use the least amount of force possible; even offering to be kind and help them may stop the aggression. That said, there are limits. Certainly, if someone is really trying to do serious harm to you or even attempting to ruin you in other ways, you have every right to defend yourself by force if needed and the force of the law.

So why am I pointing this out? Well, simply put, people have some interesting opinions about the Bible, and while I respect them and their opinions, the record needs to be set straight here. 

People think that the Bible is nothing more than a bunch of stories, aka fairy tales. Nothing could be more incorrect. The Bible was written by real people who were inspired and led by the Spirit and Jesus,
and who had interaction with God himself. I know some will say, Ha, have you? Yes, I have. There have been many instances of close calls and some near-death experiences that I have had. The most notable was shortly after birth. At 10 days old, I was operated on, and the issue of an extra valve in the heart that should not be there was due to the German measles my mother contracted during her pregnancy with me.

During the pre-op, I was given my name in case I died. There is an archived photo I have seen of this event. Though I would be hard-pressed to find it, it was reported in the media. The minister performing the ceremony lost the kit containing the communion chalice and other articles. It was brand new, never used except during that event. Also, at least 60 other children underwent the same procedure that year; none lived. God is real, just as is that other guy with the horns. And this is no joke. The Bible is no fairy tale, and it is to be read with care. If you do not understand something in it, ask a qualified Bible scholar for answers or your pastor or priest. 

I know some skeptics are still going to read this and go, bah whatev. Ok, fair, but I just wanted to let you know that the Bible is a book, not just of stories, but one that can help you make good decisions and also comfort you when the going gets rough. Take a dive in and read with an open mind and heart. But don't be shy. If you do not get what the scripture is saying, I would do a go around the room thing to make sure you have a clear reading of what you have seen in the book.

Thank you for reading this article. Pass it on and enjoy the blog.

Candid Comment - Only A Sick Mind Would Dream This Up - Execution By Nitrogen

The idea of capital punishment draws much debate around the world and, in particular, the United States. The most common method used is lethal injection. But Alabama decided to try something different—a new way to kill a human that they felt would be even more humane. The state opted for Nitrogen, a colorless, odorless gas that exists in nature but is countered by oxygen in the atmosphere. Direct exposure to the chemical can cause death as it takes oxygen away. Essentially, what the state did was use a mask like a pillow, and they suffocated a man. It's hardly humane and most certainly not quick. Witnesses described the event as quite disturbing.

Equally disturbing is that the state would allow one of its bureaucrats to dream up this idea, let alone actually do it.

Kenneth Eugene Smith was no angel and certainly deserved to be in jail for the murder he was hired to commit in 1988. Let's be clear that he was imprisoned for a crime he committed, and rightly so. The death penalty is a hot topic in the U.S. Its use is polarizing, and the methods are even more so. There is no, and I do mean NO, humane way to kill a human. Euphemisms, like they will die quickly by being injected with lethal drugs, shot through the heart, and shocked in a chair, are ridiculous. Even the guillotine caused pain and suffering, and that was considered a quick method of executing a person. No matter what method is chosen, there is going to be pain and suffering inflicted on the person being executed. The point of the death penalty is to punish, to inflict suffering, and to not only do that to the person being executed but to their family as well. It is an act of revenge, a controlled rage poured out on the person who committed the crime and the family members they leave behind. I say this because, from a biblical point of view, there is room for the use of the death penalty. It is mandated yet prohibited and permitted under a set of rules and guidelines and is to be used as the last resort. The problem is that in many places, including the U.S., it's the first action, not the last one to be taken.

Moreover, the death penalty does not reduce or deter crime. Lastly, on this point, the people involved in the execution of the death penalty should be persons with a moral character that is above reproach. I am not speaking about people who speed through red lights or jaywalking. Instead, those who embody decency and respect have a character not tarnished by scandal or history filled with skeletons in the closet. In other words, the standards for going forward with the death penalty need to be very, very high. In general, that is the case in the U.S.; in every death penalty case, the ruling is challenged immediately. That said, innocent people have been executed. There is room for error, and errors have been made in administering the death penalty. 3% is the figure that is touted as the error rate for executions in the U.S., the highest Lethal injection, with a rate of 7% of executions being botched. Oddly enough, the only method with 0 is the firing squad.

So now states want to use Nitrogen, citing the same old message: it's fast, humane, and less gruesome. As I said, there is no humane way to kill a human humanely—none zero.

If this form of punishment is allowed, it might be better for states to adopt the following rules.

1. No circumstantial evidence. Most murder trials are tired of circumstantial evidence. The risk of error is too high in these cases, along with bias and binocular vision by the police and prosecution, which means the accused may not be getting a fair trial. It might be better to have a life sentence imposed instead of the death penalty.
2. In many states that have the death penalty, sheriffs and judges, along with prosecutors, are elected officials. This introduces bias based on political motivations. That should not be a thing. A cadre of law enforcement officials who are professionally trained, unbiased, and untainted by political affiliation should be the standard. In other words, Bubba need not apply.
3. The jury system needs to be changed in states where the death penalty cases are heard. The idea that you can have an all-white jury convict a black man or vice versa is not rational or fair. A balanced cross-section of the community is a much better way to go. This includes having people who are wealthy and poor serve on juries as well.
4. Public defenders, this is a shot in the dark. The reality is that while the public defender is trained and does have some skill sets that can be helpful in a murder case, they lack the time and resources to do the job effectively. This leaves the person facing the charge at significant risk. The only natural way to fix this is to hire more to lessen caseloads and consider other ways to fund private counsel for the accused, like the proceeds from traffic tickets.
5. The federal government should standardize the method of execution for all states that opt to use the death penalty. Everything should be the same in each state. How the case is tried, how it is appealed, how it is carried out, where it is carried out, and what method is used. In other words, combine the four other suggestions I have made and make it the way it is done in each state.

Lastly, anyone who dreams up such sick ways to execute a human should be kicked out of the civil service and possibly be required to undergo a mental health assessment. Only a sick, demented person would suggest suffocation or mutilation as a method of execution is acceptable. People who think like this should not be trusted or even allowed near a position of power. Only a psychopath would offer such an idea to the governor of a state. That is what this looks like from the outside looking in. This whole idea and the use of it was wrong. That said, Smith deserved to be in prison and may well have earned the death penalty sentence, but he did not deserve to be treated like a lab rat for a bunch of gouls who wanted to see what this method of execution looks like. Pro or anti-death penalty, this was wrong, plain and simple.

Resource: Death Penalty Information Center: Botched Executions.

Candid Comment - Review 2023 And What 2024 Will Look Like For The Blog

Well, here we are again, a new year, which means it is time to look back and see what happened with the blog. I also look forward to 2024 being just as interesting as 2023 was.

The top 10 list for 2023 starts with an article on December 8 about the return to work mandates and the conflicts they are creating. In the middle of the pile, my article about freelancing can be found, and at the bottom of the list, a comment about the tragedy of the Titan submersible was posted in June of 2023.

Notice a trend? Yep, I am writing more comments and doing fewer interviews for the blog. As time passes, the blog will be reformed into a comments blog as I move more interviews to my YouTube channel, Candid Conversations Zommed in, and Video Comments. The video comments are more or less fillers between interviews for that channel, and the main focus will be interviews on YouTube and comments here on the blog.

The rationale is this. While it is interesting to interview via email, getting the right tone and messaging is challenging. I am okay with the challenge, but seeing a reaction, hearing a tone, and getting a clear message across in a video interview is much easier. Also, unlike email, I can pivot on a point in a video interview and dive into the point of view being expressed right away. 

I will still do email interviews, but they will be less of a focus.  

Thank you so much for reading the blog, and a special thank you to those returning to read the latest updates. A new record of almost 20,000 views was achieved in 2023. WOW. That is so awesome. Thank you very much for taking the time in your day to jump in and read the content loaded here on the blog. So, we go into 2024 with fresh content and a new direction for the blog. Happy New Year, and thanks again for making Candid Conversations one of your content sources.

Below is the list of the top 10 articles for 2023